Smithfield Market Timeline

1133:   St Bartholomew’s Priory by Henry I Royal Charter. St Bartholomew the patron saint of Tanners and Butchers

 

1170:   Early mention of ‘Smithfield Bar’ (BHO)

 

1174:   Early description of a Friday livestock market at Smithfield (William Fitzstephen, clerk to Thomas Becket)

 

1222:   Legalisation of Bars (Outer Gates)

 

1327:   Charter for Smithfield Market, Edward III gives City of London rights over the market and outlaws other markets within seven miles

 

1381:   City banned slaughter within the city, at Shambles; livestock had been bought at Smithfield and slaughtered at Shambles. Now it was slaughtered at Smithfield.

 

1380:   Royal Patent allowing customs to be raised from those bring animals into London

 

1394:   Farringdon Without (&Within) created, from the larger Farringdon.

 

1614:   Market paved and drained, improvements

 

1620:   Laws of the Market published by the City.

 

1638:   Royal Charter (King Charles I) confirms City control and toll collection

 

1737:   Arch over the Fleet and foundation of the Fleet Market

 

1755:   New Road (Marylebone / Euston), bypassing residential areas for animals from the west

 

1798:   Foundation of The Smithfield Club. Promotion of improvements of the 18th c. Agricultural Revolution. NB Winter feed and an end to mass slaughter in autumn / closure of market over winter. Improvements in carcase weights.

 

1799:   First Smithfield Show, Wootton’s Livery Stables, Dolphins Yard, Smithfield

 

1824:   Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

 

1829:   Foundation of Farringdon Market to replace the Fleet Market after widening of Fleet Valley thoroughfare

 

1835:   Act of Parliament to establish a meat market in Islington

Private attempt (John Perkins) to create a livestock market away from Smithfield.

Set out between Lower Road (Essex Road) and Regent Canal (Ball’s Pond)

 

1836:   Perkins market opened, City banned those trading there from using Smithfield

 

1837:   Charles Dickens’ Oliver Twist and its reference to Smithfield.

 

1840:   Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals became RSPCA with Victoria’s backing

 

1846:   Robert Peel repeal of Corn Laws, end of other import restrictions incl. foreign cattle

 

1848:   Licence controls introduced on slaughterhouses

 

1849:   Royal Commission recommends removal of livestock market at Smithfield;

City responds by asking Bunning to plan a better market still at Smithfield

 

1850:   GNR opens to Maiden Lane, completed to Kings Cross 1852

 

1851:   Paxton’s Crystal Palace built. NB Royal Agricultural Hall and Smithfield Market

 

1852:   The Smithfield Market Removal Act for relocation to Copenhagen Fields

 

Charles Person returning to his earlier idea about a central railway station is amongst those creating the City Terminus Company

 

1854: (7th August) Royal Assent to the North Metropolitan Railway Act

 

1855:   Smithfield closed (11th June)

Slaughterers at the Shambles put out of business. Slaughtering moves to Copenhagen Fields

 

The Metropolitan Cattle Market opened (13th June) (later Caledonian Market) Designed by J B Bunning

Carried live on trains but gradually slaughter and carriage by train undermined Metropolitan Market. Emergence of bric-a-brac and pedlars’ market

 

1857:   City petitions parliament for a new meat market at Smithfield

 

1860:   Metropolitan Meat and Poultry Act to build new market buildings at Smithfield

 

Following other railway acts and funding negotiations construction of Metropolitan Railway begins

 

1861:   Act of Parliament to do away with the Shambles Newgate

 

1862:   Royal Agricultural Hall opened in Islington. Smithfield Show moves to the hall

 

1863:   Metropolitan Line, Paddington to Farringdon opens

 

1864:   Horace Jones elected as Architect and Surveyor to City of London and quickly criticised because of delays in Smithfield Market

 

1865:   Metropolitan Line extended Farringdon to Moorgate

 

1866:   Metropolitan Line linked to the London, Chatham and Dover Railway by opening of the Snow Hill Tunnel. Widened lines also to Kings Cross and GNR to the north.

 

Work on new Smithfield began:

The Central Meat Market (1866–7)

The Poultry and Provision Market (1873–5); burnt down, 1958

The General Market (1879-83), intended for fruit, vegetable and fish; quickly became part of meat & poultry trade.

The Annex (1886-88), fish market but became meat market

 

1868:   (24th November); Meat Market Opening ceremony

 

1869:   Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act (to provide place for sale and slaughter of animals brought into the Port of London)

 

1871:   Horace Jones Converted Deptford dockyard into the ‘Foreign Cattle Market’

 

1872:   67-77 Charterhouse Street Butchers’ Shops with offices above (Jones’ Assistant)

 

1875:   Poultry Market opened

 

Horace Jones new ‘lairage’ and slaughterhouses at Metropolitan Cattle Market

 

1878:   Horace Jones’ speech re. Deptford Dockyard, the need for jetties, using the slipways etc.

 

1879:   General Market, replacing Fleet Market, that had been replaced by Farringdon Market (Fruit, Flowers Vegetables and Fish). Covent Garden and Billingsgate were stronger, and the General Market was quickly taken over by Meat and Poultry

 

Smithfield Market Goods Depot (Rail) opened. Others followed.

 

1881:   (to 1882) New slaughterhouse at Islington Cattle Market

 

Early reference to refrigeration equipment being fitted to a boat in New Zealand, paving way for frozen meat being imported from New Zealand, Australia and South America.

 

1883:   General Market opened

 

1885:   First frozen carcases arrive at Smithfield

 

 

1888:   Annex opened

 

(to 1889) Cold Store built over railway on Annex site; Red House

and 51 – 53, Charterhouse St; White House. (Rail links to Docks)

 

1900:   Third Cold Store, 109-113, Charterhouse St.

 

1914:   PLA Cold Store

 

1930:   Offices (Art Deco), 79-83, Charterhouse St.

 

1939:   Caledonian Market closed (by then a ‘bric-a-brac’ market)

 

(to 1945) Smithfield close, war.

 

1945:   V2 at Hart Corner, destruction of buildings and explosion in railway tunnel.

Hart Corner rebuilt in style of Horace Jones.

 

(to 1954) Food Rationing (incl. meat), Smithfield less significant, rise of suburban butchers.

 

1950:   New Caledonian Market, Bermondsey opened

 

1953:   Last slaughterhouse closed at Caledonian Road

 

1958:   Poultry burned down

 

1962:   (to 1963) New Poultry built, the largest unsupported dome in Europe at the time.

 

Rail deliveries stopped in 1960s, Beeching etc, emphasis switched to road transport.

 

1965:   General Market converted for storage and changing facilities

 

1967:   Foot & Mouth crisis virtually stopped imports from Argentina

 

Emergence of Supermarkets, own meat supply arrangements by-passing Smithfield

 

1969:   (1970) Greater London Development Plan proposed removal of wholesale markets from central London

 

1970:   Underground areas converted to large car park, removal of sidings and lifts, emphasis on lorries and vans

 

1970:   (to 1980s) decline of the docks and import of frozen meat. Need for cold storage declined.

 

 

1972:   Market Building listed

Third Cold Store, 109-113, Charterhouse St. listed

 

1973:   Membership of the EEC squeezed imports from Commonwealth

 

1976:   Start of joint planning between City and Islington about Smithfield

 

1982:   Billingsgate (City of London) removed to West India Quay

 

1983:   Annex Closed, General Market now vacant

 

1984:   City of London Working Party set up. Decided on ‘retention and renovation’, but only retaining main market building. Dispose of other buildings in favour of offices, fear of development of Docklands / Canary Wharf

 

1986:   GLC designated Smithfield a conservation area (just before its own demise)

 

1987:   City agrees compromise and refurbishment of Main Building and Poultry (revenue from office space above)

 

1988:   51 – 53, Charterhouse St, White House cold store listed.

 

1991:   Spitalfields (City of London) removed to Leyton

 

1993:   Citigen Combined Heating and Power Station starts generating in the converted PLA cold store building

 

EEC Health and Hygiene regulations come into force, implementation by refurbishment and loading pods

 

1994:   General Market closed

 

1997:   Modernisation complete, Opened by Queen Mother; see plaque on East Market Building

 

1998:   67-77 Charterhouse Street Butchers’ Shops listed

 

2000:   Poultry listed

 

2008:   First Public Inquiry ‘saves’ Smithfield

 

2014:   Second Public Inquiry ‘saves’ Smithfield. Government finds against plans to ‘gut’ the market buildings for offices and finds for plan of restoration and reuse.

Role of GLA and Boris Johnson; pro more office space

 

December: interest from the Museum of London

 

2018:   (1st August) City announces plan to combine Smithfield, Spitalfields and Billingsgate on a new site.

 

(18th December) City announces it has acquired Barking Reach Power Station site.

 

2019:   (25th April) City announces Barking Reach as preferred site for the three markets

David Beer

Billingsgate Market

It is believed that goods were landed and sold on the old Billingsgate site in the South-Eastern corner of the City since Anglo Saxon times.  A charter granted by Edward III in 1327 gave the City of London a local monopoly on the right to hold markets.  Rival markets were prohibited within 6.6 miles of the City’s boundaries.  A further charter granted by Henry VI in 1400 gave the City the right to collect tolls and customs at the major markets of Cheap, Smithfield and Billingsgate.  In those days, and for more than another century, Billingsgate traded in corn, coal, iron, wine, salt and pottery as well as fish and seafood.  It was in the 16th century that it became London’s principal fish market.  The origin of its name is unclear, but Geoffrey of Monmouth wrote that it referred to a water gate constructed by a legendary ancient king named Belinus who lived in around 400 BC.

A royal charter issued by James I in 1604 confirmed the authority of the Fishmongers’ Company to inspect the quality of fish that was being sold throughout the City, the Borough of Southwark and environs and to remove from sale any that was considered ‘unwholesome or unfit for man’s body’.  The Company has continued its inspection role at Billingsgate ever since.

An Act of Parliament of 1699 formally established it as a ‘free and open market for all sorts of fish whatsoever’.  There was, however, one short-term exception:  Dutch fishermen had then a monopoly on the sale of eels, a popular food at the time, which they sold from their boats moored in the Thames.  They had been granted this monopoly in thanks for their help in feeding the people of London in the aftermath of the Great Fire.  For the next 250 years fish and seafood was sold from stalls and sheds around the hythe or dock at Billingsgate.  By the middle of the 19th century Billingsgate is thought to have become the largest dedicated fish market in the world with an average annual sale estimated at 120,000 tons of fish, almost five times the size of its trade today.  Fish was cheaper than meat or poultry and demand for it was increasing but many still preferred not to eat it.  The amount of fish handled had become so great that a modern market building became essential and in 1850 the first such building was opened on the market’s traditional site in Lower Thames Street.  It was designed by the City architect James Bunstone Bunnning.  One description of it says that it was a picturesque red-brick building.  It was Italianate in style with a central campanile.  However, almost immediately it proved to be too small and was demolished in 1873 to make way for the building which was opened in 1876 and still stands today.  The new bigger market building was designed by Bunning’s successor as City architect, Horace Jones, and built by John Mowlem.  It is almost twice the size of its predecessor incorporating Billingsgate Stairs and Wharf and Darkhouse Lane.  It is also Italianate in style and has on its river frontage a continuous arcade flanked at each end by pavilions surmounted by weathervanes in the form of gilt fish.  The general market space covered an area of 30,000 square feet.

In 1876 the Corporation of London introduced a bye-law requiring all porters working at Billingsgate to be licensed by the market superintendent.  This formalised a portering system which had existed since the 17th century permitting only official porters to transport fish around the market leaving the traders totally reliant on them.  So being a porter became a lucrative job, which often passed from father to son.

In 1880 the London Fish Merchants’ Association was formed to represent, protect and promote the traders’ interests.

By the early 1970s it was looking inevitable that the market needed to be moved.  Lower Thames Street was to become a major dual carriageway, which would prohibit its use for the parking of market traffic.  Accordingly, in 1982 the fish market was relocated to a new 13-acre building complex close to Canary Wharf.  The move was made possible by an arrangement between the City, the fish merchants, the Docklands Joint Committee, the Department of the Environment and the London Borough of Tower Hamlets.  The site was formerly owned by the Port of London Authority.  Tower Hamlets purchased it from them and leases it to the Corporation of London for a nominal rent of wet fish,  usually one salmon, which is presented annually by the Lord Mayor to the Mayor of Tower Hamlets for distribution to old peoples’ homes in the borough.  The City of London is still the Market Authority and retains the right to make regulations and bye-laws and to collect tolls, rents and other charges.  It manages the market’s security, maintenance, cleaning and administration services.   Most of the fish now arrives by road, rather than by boat or rail, from places as far afield as Cornwall and Aberdeen.  Quality inspection is still carried out by the Fishmongers, who now also, with powers granted by DEFRA, help to ensure that only fish caught legally is sold.  The Company is actively engaged in training and assists at the Billingsgate Seafood Training School which opened in the new market complex in 2000.  Despite many protests, the bye-law licensing porters was revoked in 2012.

The Corporation of London had plans to demolish Jones’s building and redevelop the site.  A campaign to preserve the building was started by the conservation group, SAVE.  They gained the support of the architectural practice Rogers, Stirk, Harbour + Partners who strongly favoured the preservation of historic buildings of quality.  The architects found a client, National Westminster Bank, who were seeking a building with a large open area floor space and considered the fish market building ideally suited.  The conversion was effected between 1985 and 1988.  External restoration, cleaning and repair took place but nothing new was added.  Internal alterations were needed but these did not compromise the building’s structure or original design.  Rogers commented that ‘we sought harmony of modern with old in a single building’.  It is now an events venue featuring three spaces – the Grand Hall, which was once the market floor, used for large exhibitions and award dinners; the Vault, the old basement once a fish store packed with ice, now a space for conferences and sit-down dinners; and the Gallery, a new addition above the Grand Hall which is lightweight and structurally independent of the rest of the building and used for smaller exhibitions and fashion shows.

sources

My main source on Billingsgate just before Bunning’s building was erected was Judith Flanders.  The Victorian City: everyday life in Dickens’s London.  Atlantic Books, 2012.  On page 127 she writes: “many of the auctioneers met at the start of the day at Billingsgate’s most famous tavern, the Darkhouse”.  They drank amongst other beverages “gin mingled with milk”.

Paul Stokes

Sir Ernest George RA

The offices at 6-7 St Mary at Hill, built around the gateway into the churchyard, feature a decorative panel with the initials HWP and the date 1873. ‘HWP’ was Henry William Peek, a wealthy businessman who had the offices built in 1873 as an extension to his company’s premises round the corner in Eastcheap. The architect he commissioned to design the building was Ernest George, who would become one of the most eminent in the country over a career lasting nearly 60 years. He was President of the Royal Institute of British Architects for two terms in 1908-10, and was knighted in 1911. His portrait of 1910 (commissioned by the RIBA) shows a kindly gentleman, and this is borne out by comments of people who knew him: ‘a modest and private individual’, ‘a loveable personality’, ‘the kindest nature’, ‘absolutely reliable’, ‘the soul of integrity’.

Ernest George was born in 1839 in Southwark, just off New Kent Road and not far from Elephant and Castle. He was the second of six children of John and Mary George. John George went into business with his father-in-law as wholesale ironmongers with premises in Borough High Street, and when Ernest was 11 the family moved into an adjoining house. In 1854 the business transferred to new premises in Cannon Street, and the family moved to a bigger, grander house in Kennington. In 1862 they moved again, this time to Streatham. Ernest lived with his family until 1866, when he married Mary Allan Burn and they set up in their own home in Norwood. Ernest and Mary had seven children, but sadly two of them died very young within a few weeks of each other in 1872. Sadder still, Mary died in 1877 after only 11 years of marriage. Ernest never remarried, and his sister, also Mary, came to live with him to run the household and help raise the children. In 1887 they moved into a new house designed by Ernest in Ryecroft Road, Streatham Common. In 1903, his children having grown up and left home, Ernest moved to Bayswater. He continued working and only retired in 1920. He died in 1922, aged 83.

Ernest’s path to a career in architecture began in his teens. He had already shown a talent for sketching and was encouraged in this by his father and by the master at his boarding school in Reading. He then decided he wanted to be an architect, which his parents agreed to, and in 1856, aged 16 or 17, he was articled to an architect in Buckingham Street (off the Strand). The following year he also began studying at the Royal Academy Schools, where he was awarded the Gold Medal for Architecture in 1859.

At the end of his training he spent a few months gaining practical experience of working in an architect’s office. He was also able to save money to enable him to go on a tour of France and Germany to sketch architecture. This was something he continued to do throughout his life, taking a few weeks off each year to go sketching and watercolour painting on the Continent. He also recorded many London buildings and views that have long since disappeared (see the Spitalfields Life blog listed below). He was a very accomplished artist and published several volumes of prints. He was later elected as a Royal Academician.

In 1861 Ernest set up his own architectural practice in partnership with Thomas Vaughan, a fellow student at the RA. He always preferred to work with a partner, saying once that ‘the complete architect is hardly to be found in one individual’. He was always the artistic, creative force, while his partners concentrated more on the business side. After Vaughan died young in 1875, Ernest teamed up with Harold Ainsworth Peto, whose family were prosperous builders and railway contractors. This was the most prolific and successful partnership of Ernest’s career, and also saw a constant stream of pupils and assistants passing through their offices, including the young Edwin Lutyens. Peto left the practice in 1892 and moved to the country, becoming a noted landscape architect and garden designer. Ernest’s third and final partner was a former pupil, Alfred Yeates.

George and Vaughan began with small projects, including some cottages in Streatham for workers at the factory of PB Cow, rubber manufacturers (makers of Cow Gum and, much later, of the heavy rubberised fabric they trademarked as Li-Lo). Another local project was a school commissioned by the Rev Stenton Eardley, a fiery preacher and fervent advocate of temperance. (The school is now a Hindu temple.) But Ernest’s big break came in 1869 when he was contacted by Henry Peek, not to build his offices – those came later – but to design a large country house on the estate he had purchased at Rousdon in Devon, which included a whole village. First there was other work to carry out – a new church, a school, farm buildings, stables, lodges and more. Work on the house at last began in 1874, though Thomas Vaughan didn’t live to see it completed in 1878.

Ernest went on to design other country houses, as well as many projects around the country and in other parts of the world. In London his work ranged from a temperance tavern in Streatham (commissioned by Peter Cow and the Rev Eardley) to commercial premises on Cheapside and in Mayfair, but his and Peto’s speciality was large town houses in fashionable areas of London, which were a spectacular success. Their favourite style was a variety of ‘Pont Street Dutch’ (Pont Street is off Sloane Street), tall Dutch-style buildings in red brick, often with terracotta decorations or even complete terracotta facades – the terracotta was supplied by the Doulton factory in Lambeth. Ernest’s designs, though, went far beyond those of the terraces of identical properties in Knightsbridge and Kensington. He mainly designed houses singly or in pairs, exercising his full artistic powers and never repeating himself.

By the turn of the century the demand for large country and town houses was dwindling, but Ernest still had plenty of commissions. Notable among them were Royal Exchange Buildings, the Royal Academy of Music in Marylebone Road, and the architectural treatment of the new Southwark Bridge.

Another major project was Golders Green Crematorium, opened in 1902, for which he designed all the main buildings – the chapel, the superintendent’s house, the crematorium, the cloisters and two columbariums. Fittingly, when Sir Ernest died in 1922, he was himself cremated there. In 1928 a third columbarium opened, designed by his erstwhile partner, Alfred Yeates. It was named the Ernest George Columbarium.

Sources and further info

Photos on Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/groups/cityoflondonhistory

Portrait of Ernest George: https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/sir-ernest-george-18391922-priba-216400#

PhD thesis by Hilary Joyce Grainger (1985): http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/239/

Hilary J Grainger, The Architecture of Sir Ernest George (Shire Books, 2011)

Spitalfields Life blog: http://spitalfieldslife.com/2019/04/30/ernest-georges-old-london/

Rousdon Estate: http://www.rousdonestate.com/; https://www.peekhouse.co.uk/

Harold Ainsworth Peto and Sir Ernest George: http://www.victorianweb.org/art/architecture/petogeorge/index.html

Some surviving Ernest George works: 6-7 St Mary at Hill, EC3; Thomas Goode shop, 17-22 South Audley Street W1; 20-26 and 35-45 Harrington Gardens, Kensington SW7; 1-18A Collingham Gardens, Kensington SW5; 52 Cadogan Square SW1; 60-61 Piccadilly (corner of Albemarle Street); Golders Green Crematorium; Postman’s Park Memorial to Heroic Self-Sacrifice (loggia); Royal Exchange Buildings EC3; Royal Academy of Music, Marylebone Road; Southwark Bridge

painting fleet st – wiki

Carol Stanley

Horace Jones from cradle to grave

Many facts about Horace Jones and his family can be gleaned from the Ancestry website, which offers its subscribers access to a mass of primary sources full of invaluable information for family history research (other genealogy sites are also available). The sources are transcribed and indexed and often include images of the original documents. There are also family trees compiled and uploaded by users.

Probably the most used sources are indexes of births, marriages and deaths, parish registers and census returns. Civil registration of births, marriages and deaths began in 1837: indexes are free to search, but you have to pay for copies of certificates to get the detailed information. Parish registers date all the way back to the 1538, when Thomas Cromwell brought in the requirement for parishes to record baptisms, marriages and burials. The registers were kept by the individual parishes so some have not survived the ravages of time, fire, flood and being eaten by vermin! The first national census was in 1801 and they have been carried out every 10 years since then, but the 1841 census is the first to include names and other personal information useful to the family historian.

Using Ancestry is not quite as simple as the TV ads make out – you can’t just type in your name and see your family appear, but filter your searches with other details and do some detective work and you can start making connections. Entering Horace Jones’s name, birth year and place brings up many leads, including someone’s own family tree. This is interesting, but it’s more satisfying and informative to view the original sources, as follows.

Baptism of Horace Jones, parish register of Stephen Walbrook. The columns on the page show that Horace was baptised on 25 October 1820, the son of David and Sarah Lydia Jones of Sise Lane, his father’s ‘Quality, Trade or Profession’ given as Solicitor. There is no column for date of birth, but this was written in as 20 May 1819, meaning Horace was already 17 months old. Most babies were baptised within a couple of months, and even more unusual is that two of his siblings were baptised the same day, aged 5 and 3 years respectively. Looking back through the register reveals that three more Jones children were baptised on one day in 1814, and several other families had multiple baptisms as well. Strangely, very few baptisms took place in St Stephen Walbrook overall – only 15 in the whole of 1814 and six in 1816. David and Sarah Lydia had two more daughters baptised there, in 1822 and 1824, and the family tree on Ancestry shows two earlier daughters: one baptised in 1805 in St Andrew Holborn, when her father’s abode was Barnard’s Inn, and the other born in 1806 (location unknown). So Horace was one of 10 children.

Sise Lane today is barely 20 metres long, a brick-paved alley tucked behind Number 1 Poultry and leading into Pancras Lane. There are two separate plaques marking the site of St Benet Sherehog, which was burnt down in the Great Fire and not rebuilt. The church was originally dedicated to the Saxon St Osyth, hence the name of Sise Lane. A map of 1819 shows that it then extended down to Budge Row, roughly where the passageway runs through today’s Bloomberg building. Most of the lane was demolished to make way for Queen Victoria Street, built in 1867-72 when, ironically, Horace Jones was City Surveyor and had to oversee the destruction of the house where he grew up.

Marriage of Horace’s parents, St Michael Bassishaw. The parish register records the marriage on 21 April 1804 of ‘David Jones of this Parish Batchelor [sic] & Sarah Lydia Shepherd of the Parish of St. Mary le Strand Spinster’. St Michael Bassishaw stood just behind today’s Guildhall North Wing, but was demolished in 1900.

Burials of Horace’s parents, St Stephen Walbrook. The parish register records the burial on 17 September 1833 of Sarah Lydia Jones of Size Lane and Peckham Rye, age 52 years, and on 25 July 1841 that of David Jones of Size Lane, age 64 years.

1841 census, Sise Lane. Just seven weeks before David Jones was buried, the census recorded who was where on the night of 6 June, with address, name, age, sex, occupation and whether born in the county. Ages were rounded down to the nearest five years. The enumerator’s book covering Sise Lane shows a household consisting of David Jones, age 60, Mary Jones (30), Fanny Jones (20) and Horace Jones (20), plus Elizabeth Shepherd (60) and Ann Hodges (30). Mary and Fanny were Horace’s sisters and Elizabeth Shepherd his mother’s sister, probably acting as housekeeper. The only occupation given is that of Ann Hodges who is described as ‘F.S.’, female servant. All were born in the county.

1851 census, Furnival’s Inn. From 1851 onwards the census had extra columns for relation to head of household, marital status and birthplace. Horace Jones is listed as head of household (in fact he was the only member), unmarried, age 31, architect and surveyor, born in London.

1861 census, Staines. On census night 1861 Horace was in Staines, Middlesex, a visitor in the household of Jeremiah Finch, mustard manufacturer. He was unmarried, 41, architect, born in London. In the same census, two of his sisters were sharing a house in Dorking, and a brother and two more sisters were together in Wandsworth Common; all were unmarried.

1871 census, Westminster. In 1871, still unmarried and aged 51, Horace was living in a flat in Victoria Street, with just a general servant in attendance.

Marriage of Horace Jones, St Marylebone. On 15 April 1875 Horace Jones at last got married, as recorded in the parish register. A bachelor, his profession is given as ‘esquire’, he is resident in St Marylebone and the son of David Jones, gentleman. His bride is Ann Elizabeth Patch, spinster, of Christ Church, Lee, Kent, daughter of John Patch, esquire – he was actually a barrister. Horace and Ann are ‘of full age’: in fact he was nearly 56 while she was 36. The officiating minister was Henry Patch, presumably a relation of Ann.

1881 census, Marylebone. In 1881 the couple were living at 30 Devonshire Place, Marylebone (this runs on from Wimpole Street up to Marylebone Road). With the couple is their 4-year-old daughter Annie H. Jones – full name Annie Horatia – who was born in Brighton, and there are five servants to take care of them.

Burial of Sir Horace Jones, South Metropolitan Cemetery. Now known as West Norwood Cemetery, its register records the burial of Sir Horace Jones on 27 May 1887. He was joined there by his widow on 11 September 1889.

Probate Calendar. On 2 July 1887 the will of Sir Horace Jones, who died at 30 Devonshire Place on 21 May 1887, was proved at the Principal Registry by two executors: his widow and Octavius (mistakenly printed as Octavia) Hansard of 8 Argyll Place, architect. Sir Horace’s personal estate is given as £20,311 15s 9d.

Sir Horace Jones’s tomb can be seen today in West Norwood Cemetery. Of a very plain design, it has wording around all four sides and all over the flat top. It appears that Sir Horace and Dame Ann are actually buried there, but the inscriptions also commemorate five of his siblings and his aunt, Elizabeth Shepherd. Some of these are recorded in the cemetery register, but the dates of their deaths range from the 1850s to 1897, so they can’t all be buried in the same tomb.

Carol Stanley

Gresham College

Sir Thomas Gresham (1519 -1579)                                      

His Will and Endowments with reference to Gresham College –

The tradition of wealthy merchants leaving endowments in their Will for City institutions and charities was nothing new.  Sir Richard Whittington , the 15th century Lord Mayor of London, is the perfect example of someone who left legacies that would finance public projects for many hundreds of years.  Thomas Gresham was following tradition.

However, having read some fairly ancient commentaries on why Thomas Gresham wanted to endow a new College of learning in the City, there appears to be some speculation about his motives.

There is reason to believe that Thomas’ idea of forming an education establishment had been in his thoughts for sometime before his Will of 1575.  It is thought that Gresham’s first choice of endowment was his Alma Mater, Cambridge University.  He promised £500 to Cambridge for either the support of some ancient foundation or towards the erection of a new college.  There is evidence of letters from the authorities at Cambridge, twice reminding Thomas Gresham of his intentions to endow.  They also argued against a college in London, which would prove prejudicial to both the interests of Cambridge and Oxford.

The early death of Thomas’ son in 1564 and of his niece in 1573 may have prompted a re-think.  With no dynasty and no provincial birthplace to lavish his endowments the City would be the place where his name would be established   “indelibly as a civic benefactor of the greatest munificence”

Writers also note that Thomas Gresham’s knighthood came through his reputation as a Merchant Adventurer and Queen’s Agent and not through his livery company or civic duties.  He was never in the Court of Alderman or in the civic hierarchy.  He needed a way of securing his civic legacy.  However there is no doubt that Thomas Gresham’s public spirit, his benevolence and his encouraging of learning were celebrated in the foundation of Gresham College.

Thomas’ Will states that lectures were to be given within his own house in Bishopsgate.  It has been commented that the design of the house, its reading Hall and apartments  ‘ seemed to herald its possible future as a college’. He built the house in circa 1558, some years before the Will of 1575.  Thomas must have felt Cambridge University was well provided for and London wasn’t.  He really wished for London to have a prestigious seat of learning.

Thomas’ Will instructs the Mayor and the Corporation of the City of London to nominate 4 persons to read lectures on Divinity, Music and Geometry within his own “dwelling house in the parish of St. Helen’s Bishopsgate”   – a sum of £200 annually was to be given equally to the readers for their salaries and stipends.  These were considered to be generous amounts at the time. They were to be funded by the rents from the Royal Exchange and were to be paid twice yearly on the Feast of the Annuniciation and of St. Michael Archangel.

He also instructed the Mercers Company to appoint 3 further persons ( and their successors) to read Law, Physic and Rhetoric, with a shared stipend of £150 annually.

“The readers were to be sufficiently learned and would be able to use his mansion, gardens and appurtenances”.  Here they would live and study.  The readers must be single men and if they married would have to leave the college.  This fact remains something of a mystery to historians.  It could have been to give opportunities to widowers.  Thomas also wanted to appoint graduates of Oxford and Cambridge where academics tended to marry later due to their studies.  These would be young men, not burdened with adult responsibilities, could therefore devote their life wholly.  They would be resident without families. *

These wishes would only come into force after the death of his widow Alice in 1596.

The Will gave very little detail otherwise in guiding Thomas’ foundation.  However a quote from the Governors of the Institution directs

“the public reading of the said lectures might be performed in a such a manner as should tend to the glory of God and the common benefit of the people of this city which we doubt not to be the principle end of the founder in ordaining the said lectures” 

Lectures were to be free and were to be twice a day at 8am amd 2pm.  Gresham lectures were advertised in the Royal Exchange to ‘their intended audience’.  There was a bell at the Royal Exchange which rang twice a day to give notice of the lectures.

Monday:     Physic

Tuesday:     Law -3/4 hour in Latin and ¼ hour in English.  Directed at discussing  legal questions most likely to prove interesting to merchants and citizens .

Wednesday:   Divinity.  Readings were to endorse the teachings of the Church of England and condemn the false opinions of popery and other sects.

Thursday:    Geometry

Friday:          Astronomy

Saturday:      Music

Rhetoric was to be lectured on every day of the week.

Lectures were to be in Latin so “diverse strangers of foreign countries who resort to Gresham College will greatly desire to hear the reading of the said lectures”

*The principle of being an un married man did become a bone of contention in the 18th century and cast doubts over the College’s future.

 

Sources:

The Life and Times of Thomas Gresham Vol 2  by Burgon

Gresham College by S.J. Teague

Thomas Gresham   – Margaret Pelling

Mary


Current – POLICY AND OBJECTIVE

  • Foster study, learning and research, particularly (but not exclusively) in those disciplines represented by the Gresham Professorships
  • Supplement the disciplines of the Gresham Professorships with a range of relevant additional series, one-off lectures, seminars and symposia in subject areas as considered appropriate in the twenty-first century
  • Foster academic consideration of contemporary issues and problems
  • Challenge those who live and work in London and elsewhere to engage in intellectual debate
  • Make a contribution to society through the pursuit, dissemination, and application of knowledge, by means of innovative collaboration and partnerships
  • Be open and all-embracing, encouraging diversity both in disciplines and the profile of Professors, lecturers and audiences
  • Publicise and communicate the work of the College and its Professors, sharing information and new learning to an ever-widening and increasing audience in London, the UK and beyond

He wished for London to have a prestigious seat of learning like Oxford and Cambridge. It was unthinkable that the City should lack such an institution. So he left provision for Gresham College to have a premises and funding for seven professors, each to deliver a lecture once a week in Latin and English. The chairs were, and are: Astronomy; Divinity; Geometry (i.e. Mathematics); Law; Music; Physic; Rhetoric. An eighth chair – Commerce – was added

The lectures at Gresham College were to be given by seven professors who would receive an annual stipend and be provided with rooms at the College which was located in Thomas Gresham’s large mansion in Bishopsgate. Four of the seven professorships: Divinity, Astronomy, Geometry and Music, were appointed by the Corporation of London and the other three: Law, Physic and Rhetoric, by the Mercers’ Company. In 1985 a Chair in Commerce funded by the Mercers’ School Memorial Trust became the eighth subject. The inaugural lectures took place in October 1597.Over four hundred years later the City of London Corporation and the Mercers’ Company continue to make these appointments and the professors continue to give free public lectures, augmented by visiting professors lecturing on other topics. Lectures are usually given at the College’s premises at Barnard’s Inn or at the Museum of London.


Gresham College buildings

Gresham College was established in 1597 in the mansion that Thomas Gresham had had built between Bishopsgate and Broad Street in 1559-62. Based around courtyards and with a large quadrangle and a reading hall, it bore a resemblance to the colleges at Oxford and Cambridge, so maybe Gresham already intended to make it an educational institution.

An engraving dated much later, 1740, gives a good picture of the property (search ‘Gresham College’ on Collage to see the engraving by George Vertue). The various areas are numbered and the key identifies the lodgings of the seven professors, along with the reading hall, the ‘elaboratory’, courtyards and galleries, the stables and even the turret housing an astronomical telescope, specially built for Robert Hooke. And, facing on to Broad Street, there are the eight Gresham Almshouses.

Going back 80 years to the 1660s, there were probably superficial differences, but the layout of the college would have been much the same. There was masses of space, far more than seems necessary for seven professors, even with a number of servants looking after them. In 1660 some of the spare space was taken over by the new Royal Society, which was founded in November that year by a group of 12 men who met after a lecture by the then Gresham Professor of Astronomy, Christopher Wren. The Society met weekly to witness experiments and discuss scientific topics, and it quickly built up a substantial library and collection of specimens and equipment.

But the College was soon to become much more crowded, and the reason for that was the Great Fire of 1666. The College was not touched by the fire, as shown in Hollar’s map of 1667, and such a large property was a huge asset for the City Corporation, which of course was the joint owner with the Mercers’ Company. Already on Thursday 6 September, with the City still smouldering, an emergency meeting was held at Gresham House and it was decided that the City officials who had lost their dwellings would move in. The Lord Mayor, Thomas Bludworth, the Sheriffs, the Town Clerk, the Chamberlain, the City Swordbearer and various others took over parts of the lodgings of the professors, despite some opposition. Special dispensation was granted to the Gresham Professor of Astronomy and to Robert Hooke, the Royal Society’s Curator of Experiments, because of the collections they looked after and so that the Royal Society could continue to meet. The Society, though, soon moved out as Gresham House began to fill up with refugees from the burnt-out Royal Exchange. (It eventually returned in 1673 and stayed until 1711, when it moved into its own building.)

The merchants, traders and shopkeepers from the Royal Exchange needed to get back down to business as soon as they could, and so a subcommittee was set up to divide up and allocate the available space in Gresham College. Within weeks every nook and cranny was filled with stalls and booths: not just the rooms but the galleries, walks, warehouses and cellars. Sheds were erected against walls and in gateways, and there was such a demand for space that even the poor almsmen were asked to vacate their rooms, being given an extra £3 6s 8d each to provide themselves with lodgings. Needless to say, it was impossible to hold public lectures or do any teaching. This situation lasted for nearly five years until the new Royal Exchange was ready. (There are many more details in Hazel Forsyth’s book produced for the Great Fire exhibition at the Museum of London, see below.)

Returning to the 1740 engraving, this image may be deceptive and somewhat idealised. For years the Joint Grand Gresham Committee – the City Corporation and the Mercers – had been rather neglecting their responsibilities as regards the upkeep of the College. As early as 1701 they petitioned Parliament to be allowed to demolish the property, build a smaller replacement College and let out the rest of the site. Permission was refused, and the same happened in 1760 when the Committee submitted another petition, this time proposing only to provide a room for the lectures elsewhere. But in 1768 the government issued a compulsory purchase order for the site, in order to build a grand new Revenue and Excise Office. The Corporation and the Mercers had no choice but to hand over the property, which was duly demolished – to make things worse, the Corporation and the Mercers had to pay the cost of the demolition. The almsmen were moved to new accommodation in Whitecross Street, but Gresham College was left homeless. The lectures continued, being delivered at various places in the City including – somewhat ironically – in the Royal Exchange, until that burnt down again in 1838. A commentator wrote in the 1840s that: ‘… a small, dirty, dusky room in the upper story of the old Royal Exchange was selected by the liberal and enlightened Joint Grand Gresham Committee for the lectures, and there, at very inconvenient hours during term time, certain of the professors drawled out vapid nonsense to a thin and sneering audience, until that edifice was consumed by fire.’

Things soon got better, though, and in 1842 a new purpose-built college opened in the newly created Gresham Street on the corner of Basinghall Street. It had a lecture theatre, library and other facilities, the lecture theatre seating 240 with a further 180 in the gallery until 1908 when the gallery was closed by the Fire Officer. Through the second half of the 19th century the College’s fortunes improved as the demand for education increased. Public lectures were particularly popular in the early 20th century and in 1911 an adjacent site was acquired and the College was enlarged. The building still displays two foundation stones, for the two sides of the Joint Committee. Lectures continued, except during the Second World War, when the building was used by the Office of Works and the Air Raid Disasters Department, and also hosted concerts and the occasional dance.

Lectures resumed after the war, but with poor attendances there were lengthy discussions about the future of the College. In 1958 its library was transferred to the Guildhall and in the 1960s the building was rented out. The lectures were moved to the City University building in St John’s Street, and then for a while in the 1980s the College was located in Frobisher Crescent in the Barbican. It then operated from Mercers’ Hall and finally, in 1991, Gresham College found a new home in Barnard’s Inn Hall, where it remains today.

Barnard’s Inn dates back to at least the mid 13th century, when it was part of the estate of Sir Adam de Baysing, a City merchant and draper. (His name survives in Basinghall Street and Bassishaw Ward.) It later passed to John Mackworth, who became Dean of Lincoln and left it to the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln when he died in 1451. It was already being used as a school for legal training and by 1435 it was named Barnard’s Inn after its Principal, Lionel Barnard. In 1454 it became an Inn of Chancery, linked (along with Staple Inn) to Gray’s Inn. It was badly damaged in 1780 in the Gordon Riots when a gin distillery next door was set alight by rioters because it was owned by a Roman Catholic. By 1830 Barnard’s Inn had become a set of residential chambers, then in 1888 the link with the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln was broken. Soon after that it was purchased by the Mercers’ Company to house  the Mercers’ School, which remained there until 1959.

The Hall itself dates from the 15th century and has 16th-century linen-fold panelling. Other rooms are 18th century, while in the room below the Hall there is some late Saxon or medieval walling possibly reusing Roman materials. In 1932 the Mercers organised substantial renovations to the roof and windows of the Hall and also installed two Tudor-style fireplaces. Further renovations were carried out in 1990, with facilities added for meetings and functions, ready for Gresham College to move in the following year. Today, lectures are held in the Hall as well as in the larger-capacity Weston Theatre at the Museum of London.

Collage: https://collage.cityoflondon.gov.uk

Richard Chartres and David Vermont, A Brief History of Gresham College 1597-1997 (Gresham College, 1998; downloadable PDF at https://www.zyen.com/documents/1819/A_Brief_History_of_Gresham_College.pdf

Hazel Forsyth, Butcher, Baker, Candlestick Maker (I.B. Tauris, 2016)

Carol


Gresham College – The Syllabus

Nowadays, we have television we have access to the Internet academic book production has been rising almost exponentially but how do we find out about trends in knowledge. What comes next? Where do we go from here? What are theGreat challenges ahead of us?

I think these questions were appreciated by Thomas Gresham in the founding of his college which is really quite extraordinary in its apparent simplicity yet and it’s one off-ness.

Fast forward 400 years, who are these trustees led by the Provost, not the principal or the Dean or the head, who helps decide what these issues are today. He and the trustees have sufficient heft to be able to consider these questions and attract those in the fields who might be capable of leading the way.

The work of Gresham College was a novel educational concept and was to to boot, founded in  London readily accessible by the trading adventurers. It is possible that Gresham could see the potential of such a college without having really real idea as to how it might to be developed. One of the significant feature was that the lectures were to be free and open to any not only those with formal learning. Additionally lectures had to also be in the vernacular as well as Latin.

What is noticeable is that the emphasis was to be on the application of learning. Judy and I have some experience of this difficulty which we are told (By Richard charters 20 years ago, oh)it is difficult to occupy competently and with integrity but that the world between professional academic scholarship and the world of practitioners remains a very important thing to attempt.

During the 400 years also of its existence the lectures and the people appointed was somewhat open to who was on the committee of trustees at the time. When lectures started, 20 years after Gresham’s death, Not surprisingly the unmarried lecturers from Oxford and Cambridge fought to get their own way in regard of lectures, hours and term times. They lived in Thomas Gresham‘s old house but but sometimes rented rooms in preference and we are told occasionally rented out the Thomas Gresham rooms

The professors were appointed to read lectures and Each was to receive £50 (rents for the REx) which was paid at the feast of the Annunciation and Michaelmas.  This was more than the regius professor at Oxford or Cambridge and at the time, although they came from Oxford and Cambridge themselves. The professors at Gresham‘s could not be married-  if they  took a wife they had to resign   This was on the basis that Gresham felt that seven men could live peaceably together but Id there were seven women and they would not. The first female professor, of astronomy, was appointed in 1993.
The selection of four professorships in Divinity astronomy music and geometry was to be carried out by the city of London corporation whilst the Mercers company was responsible for appointing those in law physic and rhetoric. Inclusion of astronomy and geometry we’re both noteworthy because at that time no such chairs had been established that either Oxford or Cambridge. It is tempting to think that the publication in 1543 of Copernicus work on the heliocentric system influences this inclusion, But it is possible that his writings have not got this far at that time.
But Gresham realised that the merchant who understood navigation would have the advantage Richard Hakyult lamented at this point the lack of anything in England to match the French lectures in navigation.

Each subject had its regulations. The Astronomy professor was to ‘raise the principles of the sphere, the theories of the planets and to explain the common instruments for the capacity of Mariners, and he was to apply these things to use by reading geography and the art of navigation’.

The geometry professor was to lecture for one term on arithmetic the next on theoretical geometry of the third all practical geometry.

It was to be clearly understood that the lectures should be popular and avoid interest. He was against getting them to deliver the lectures solely in Latin, to make them too obscure or overly theoretical.

In terms of the history of science in England the chairs for astronomy and geometry were the first in those subjects at any English university. So Sir Thomas clearly understood the importance of separate disciplines many years earlier than Oxford or Cambridge.

At the time of that Richard charterers wrote his book, followed following the move to Barnett Hill, other ventures were taken up. There was attempts to bring together countries of the European communion to discuss control of multinational corporations.
 There was discussion on ways to provide education for the 16 to 19-year-olds, and challenges to medical education which recent advances in medical and scientific research presented. They ran seminars for senior management on how new information technology could help business. Another time of him writing his book there were attempts to look at the difficulties faced by the growing number of voluntary organisations. At this time the woman moves to consider what it must be like for people living in large conurbations, the model for many people’s future existence. These are practical issues and ones which now after many centuries universities as well I’ll being forced to consider
The early days of Gresham College and what was taught seem to have been a curates egg. But In the scientific area there are Significant advances in scholarship due to a number of outstanding young scholars. One author, Christopher Hill, noted that the science of Elizabeths reign was the work of merchants and craftsman not of the dons, and it was carried out in London. The scientific advances were held to be connected with trade and to solve practical problems of navigation, accounting, surveying and military engineering. The Gresham chairs were a boon to the scientific community in the early 17th century
The Royal Society grew out of Gresham College. Gresham College was a wonderful meeting place and had laboratories where experiments could be done. Robert Hooke who became the professor of geometry asked for and was given by the committee, £40 to build a tower on the college for astronomical observations.  His professors salary allowed him to be independent and to follow his scientific investigations and also gave him lodging.
As a result of such work, Gresham College soon acquired a reputation – internationally – as a place of academic research, with professors who were in some cases working at the centre of the intellectual revolution of the 17th century. Considerable profits were available to those cities that could gain an advantage by solving practical problems.
Solving these problems of navigation, accounting, surveying and military engineering were more important to London’s economy than Ivory Tower studies.
Some of the early inventions included logarithms, a surveying tool called Gunters chain which was 22 yards long subdivided into 100 loops. We all remember early imperial measurement well 10 chains equals 1 furlong and 8 furlongs. equals 1 mile.
Also John Graves set up 4 measuring devices to measure the lunar eclipses.
Not only science flourished but the arts also for instance Elizabeth the first requested that John Ball became the first Gresham  professor of music.
Today three further  Professor ships have been added to take account of areas not otherwise covered by the original professorships,‘s
commerce (1985),
environment (2014)
and IT (2015). Positions are held for three years extendable for fourth year and they give six lectures a year. There are also visiting professors and a large number of single lecture speakers
The categories in the subjects of the college don’t quite correspond with the 10 professorships. The following is a list of current holders which gives an idea of the subject coverage and it appears that professors have been appointed who can extend beyond their specialism boundaries.
Astronomy (Christopher Wren), Joseph Silk graduate of Cambridge and Harvard Main work in astrophysics and
Business (The Mercers school memorial Professor) Alex Edmunds clever graduate of Oxford and professor of finance
Divinity Alec Ryrie, professor of history of Christianity
Environment Jacqueline McGlade, Cambridge a marine biologist , studies ecosystems and climate change
Geometry (Robert Hooke) Chris Budd, Oxford and Cambridge applied mathematics and non-linear mechanics.
IT Richard Harvey a mathematician interested in Computer vision and artificial intelligence
Law Joe Delahunty QC working as a barrister with families and children in the High Court
Music (John Ball) the music journalist television and radio presenter
Physic (medicine) Chris Witty Epidemiologist and physician with a speciality in tropical diseases
Rhetoric Andrew Jonathan pate who specialises in Shakespeare romanticism and eco-criticism. Oxford and Cambridge
There are also 10 visiting professorships including political history, Film and media, Russian music, classics, medical education, geology, the built environment, and artificial intelligence
Since the lectures have been downloaded onto YouTube they have been in excess of 20 million viewings.Currently there are up to 300 free public lectures offered every year.

In this lecture series by Professor Christopher Budd, the emphasis will be how mathematics gives us a glimpse into the future both of technology and of many other areas of our lives.

Since Newton, we have become used to science making confident predictions about the future, including on the motion of the planets and the times of the tides. However, some things seem very hard to predict, such as the stock market or the weather. Is this a fault in the way we model these systems, or is there a genuine limit to how far we can predict the future? One explanation comes from the theory of chaos, which explains why small changes now can lead to large uncertainty in the future. Professor Budd will describe how chaos theory works and how things can change rapidly.

Climate change is important, controversial, and the subject of huge debate. Much of our understanding of the future climate comes from the use of complex climate models, which are based on mathematical and physical ideas. Professor Budd will describe how these models work and the assumptions that go into them. He will discuss how reliable our predictions of climate change will be and show how mathematics can give us insights into both the past and the future.

One of the biggest advances in modern technology has been the development of GPS systems which allow us to find our position to very high precision. GPS is just the latest advance in the science of navigation, which has had a profound effect on human civilization. Professor Budd will show how mathematics has played a vital role in making navigation as accurate as it is today and the impact this has had on us all. Indeed, it is one of the few areas where Einstein’s general theory of relativity directly impacts our lives.

The world’s population is rapidly growing, and most of this population will live in large city conurbations. What will our future cities look like? How will the transport system work, how will people move around, and how will we supply them with energy and remove their waste? Indeed, what sort of houses will people live in and what will our communities look like in the future? Professor Budd will show how mathematical models can help us understand how cities work and how they might evolve in the future.

Mathematics education is changing rapidly and a big driver for this is the use of new technology. The widespread use of computers has transformed the way we do mathematics, with computers not only able to mark exam papers, but also to do the algebra required to answer the questions. Professor Budd will look at the modern developments of computer-based teaching and learning. At the same time, he examines the parts of teaching maths which require the human touch and a future of maths education where computers and human teachers work well together.

Thanks to –
Richard Chartres A Brief History of Gresham College 1997
Valerie Shrimplin Sir Thomas Gresham and his vision for Gresham College  2017.

Measuring devices that came out of Gresham’s College

 

 

 

 

 

A diagram of Gunters Chain.A measuring device 66 ft long and 1/80 of a mile

 

 

 

Robert Hooks weather devices. Above a Wheel Barometer. Below his Weather Clock
which every quarter of an hour, recorded The pressure, temperature, the moisture of the air, the direction and velocity of the wind, and the rainfall it was completed to the satisfaction of the Royal Society in May 1679


The library

The Long Gallery at Gresham College was home to the Arundel Library from 1678 to c. 1710.  It had belonged to Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel, the most important collector in early 17th century Britain.  His grandson, Henry Howard, donated the library to the Royal Society in 1667 at the urging of John Evelyn.  At that time it was valued at £1000.  Evelyn wrote in his diary: ‘Many of these books had been presented by Popes, Cardinals and great persons to the Earls of Arundel and the Dukes of Norfolk’.  Sadly the Arundel Library no longer survives as 90% of the collection was sold off by the Royal Society in the 19th century1.  But did Gresham College itself possess a library in the 17th and 18th centuries?  Irene Gilchrist, a former librarian at the Guildhall Library thought that at some point in the College’s history there would have been a very active library but it vanished2.  Perhaps she was merely speculating but if she was right, then its past can be compared to that of the much older Guildhall Library, where the Gresham collection is now housed.  That famous library founded by the executors of the estates of William Berry (or Bury) and Richard Whittington in the years 1423 to 1425 was taken into his own possession by Lord Protector Somerset, Edward Seymour, in 1549 and the Guildhall was effectively without a library from then until the 1820s.  It was just a decade later that a new Gresham College Library began to emerge.

In 1838 the Gresham Professor of Music, a bass singer named Edward Taylor, launched an appeal, reported in the Gentleman’s Magazine, for money and books to found a music library at Gresham College3.  He had been appointed in October 1837, took up his duties in January 1838 and continued as Professor of Music until his death in 1863.  He very quickly took steps to form a library.  At the time the College was in temporary accommodation at the City of London School and donations were asked to be sent to the secretary of the school.  Professor Taylor claimed that Queen Victoria was the first benefactor to donate a book.  The London firm of music sellers and publishers, Messrs Coventry & Hollier gave a set of the works of the previous Gresham Professor of Music, Richard John Samuel Stevens and very quickly more donations followed and the collection grew.  The Guildhall Library still has some letters which people wrote when donating items at this time.  As well as individual donors the new library was swelled by gifts from institutions such as the Musical Antiquarian Society and the Sacred Harmonic Society.  In 1848 an appeal was raised for money to purchase a bookcase.  In 1851 items were lettered presumably to indicate that they belonged to Gresham College.  In 1855 £10 was given for repair and binding.  Throughout the 19th century there were various pleas for money to create catalogues.  At that time many libraries still had codex catalogues, which were printed bound listings of the material held and the Guildhall Library has examples of the Gresham College Library catalogues from certain years.  Producing such catalogues was inefficient in terms of the costs involved and financing the library appeared always to have been an issue.  It was normally the Guildhall librarian who compiled and updated the catalogue upon the request of the Gresham Committee.  It does not seem that Gresham College ever employed a librarian of its own.  By the end of the 19th century library catalogues almost universally took the form of drawers full of 5×3 inch cards.  Gresham College Library did switch to a card catalogue for its printed books but it is not known at what date.  A typewritten catalogue exists from 1930 which was compiled by William Charles Smith, Assistant Keeper of Printed Books at the British Museum and a specialist in musical bibliographies.  The printed books are now included in the City of London Libraries Online Catalogue with the shelfmark GRESHAM, but the music library is still only listed in a printed catalogue, the most recent version of which was published by the Corporation of London in 1965.

Until 1871 the collection was very much dedicated to music scores, the theory and practice of music and to the history of music.  Two of its treasures are an autograph manuscript by Henry Purcell and the earliest surviving text of Thomas Tallis’s Spem in Alium.  In 1871 a large private collection was bequeathed to the College by Mrs Laetitia Hollier.  She was not the widow of John Hollier who had been a partner in the firm that made one of the earliest donations to the music collection, but of Richard Hollier.  Described as ‘a gentleman and a scholar’ Richard in his own will of 1852 set up scholarships in Greek and Hebrew at University College London4 which are still awarded today.  Perhaps John and Richard were related.  In any event the Holliers were a fairly prominent City family who were associated with a gold refining business in Love Lane and one of the family had been City Marshal.  So an explanation for Laetitia Hollier’s decision to leave her pictures and books to Gresham College might be a connection to it through her husband’s family.  Another explanation could be a connection through her own family.  According to a family tree on the internet her mother’s name was Ann Gresham5.  Laetitia’s solicitor, John Evans, described the collection: ‘The pictures are about forty in number, of various qualities.  Some of them are valuable, but many are inferior.  The books consist of about 1,200 volumes, and I have reason to believe that many of them are valuable and all of them are good’.  The College had this collection catalogued in 1872 and that catalogue is now freely available in digital form on Google Books6.  There are books on subjects such as mathematics, architecture and astronomy.  It also included many very fine and rare travel books and a number of bibles.  The travel books are described on a Guildhall Library blog entry of 20 November 20137, as follows: ‘The travel books primarily date from the first half of the nineteenth century, but also include some works from the late eighteenth century and contain fascinating first-hand accounts of expeditions both overland and by sea. The authors were intrepid travellers and were often emissaries, army, navy and medical personnel or employed by wealthy patrons and on behalf of foreign potentates. Often featuring sociological and anthropological surveys of the countries and their people, the volumes may also include ecological and natural history reports, maps, select dictionaries and vocabularies of the indigenous population and even sheet music with accompanying local songs. Some ambitious works cover the world, but most concentrate on a specific country or region and were often written as a diary, journal, reports or letters. Considering the dangers and difficulties of charting what was often unknown territory, these works represent amazing feats of courage, determination, skill and survival.  Some follow the trading routes, especially to Turkey and through Central Asia to the Far East. Others include travels through Russia, Lapland, Greenland and expeditions to the North Pole’. It is Mrs Hollier’s collection, secondary to the music library, which forms the worth and importance of the Gresham College Library surviving today.  Ann Martin of the Guildhall Library has told me that the Gresham Library now only has 381 printed works and 123 music manuscripts8.

At the beginning of the 20th century upkeep of the library does not seem to have been a priority for the College or for the Gresham Committee who provided funding.  However, it remained held within the College and survived both world wars.  It still received support from the Guildhall Library which made a gift of various pieces of surplus library equipment, such as periodical boxes, filing cabinets and catalogue card drawers in 1950.  In 1958 the College decided to ask the Guildhall Library if it could transfer its collection there.  In November of that year the music library was deposited in its entirety as were the travel books.  Material on other subjects was sorted and duplicates and items unwanted by the Guildhall were presented by the Gresham Committee to the Royal Library at Malta9, now known as the National Library of Malta.

Paul Stokes

References:

  1. Peck, LV. Uncovering the Arundel Library at the Royal Society: changing meanings of science and the fate of the Norfolk donation.  Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 1998 22 Jan; 52 (1): 3-24.
  2. Gilchrist, Irene. Rich and learn’d: the library of Gresham College.  Gresham Lecture given on 20 March 2007.
  3. Anon. Gresham musical library.  Gentleman’s Magazine 1838; 10: 305-306.
  4. http://www.hollyer.info/iow.php
  5. https://gw.geneanet.org/pammercier?lang=en&p=laetitia&n=phillips&oc=1
  6. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Catalogue_of_Books_and_Music_in_the_Libr.html?id=ABTdmhmc8TgC&redir_esc=y
  7. https://guildhalllibrarynewsletter.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/early-travel-books-gresham-collection/
  8. Martin, Ann. Gresham College Library.  Email dated 18 March 2019.
  9. Chartres, Richard and Vermont, David. A brief history of Gresham College 1597 – 1997.  London: Gresham College, 1998.

The Construction of the First Royal Exchange

For merchant’s trading their goods in Antwerp, they were able to sell in the Bourse, the name originating from the merchant’s  meeting place In Bruges, prior to Antwerp.    The first Antwerp Bourse, built in 1515, had a gallery or portico over two of its four sides.  The second Bourse was built in 1530 with a rectangular courtyard with a portico resting on 38 decorated columns, two great towers and four double doorways.

Thomas Gresham knew this building intimately, its stone, mortar and builders.

However, in London the meeting place for business in Lombard Street in all weathers.

In 1534, The Court of Common Council began to discuss the project for a similar building and three years later the Aldermen chose a site near The Pope’s Head on Lombard Street.

At this time, Sir Richard Gresham, in his year of office as Lord Mayor, pushed and pressed Thomas Cromwell on the project and showed him a plan, (plat), for the building and suggested £2,000 or more to build a beautiful exchange, “For the honour of our Sovereign Lord and King”.

At first, Sir George Monnocks, owner of the land, stood in the way of progress, refusing to sell his property on the intended site but he gave way after pressure from the King himself.  However, nothing happened and The City records fall silent.

There was a wait of the better part of thirty years and the founder and builder, Sir Richard Gresham’s greatest legacy, was left in his son Thomas’s hands.

In 1562, it was on the suggestion of Thomas Gresham’s factor, Richard Clough and with the joint ownership of The City of London Corporation, that a Trapezoidal shape, (quadrilateral with no two sides parallel), be built between Cornhill and Threadneedle Streets and converging at Bank junction and to become Britain’s first specialist commercial building.

Richard Clough oversaw the importing of some materials from Antwerp of stone and slate.  Wainsot of oak for panelling or boarding on room walls to a limited height, and glass, came from Amsterdam and other materials from Flanders, with Clough paying thousands of pounds.

Gresham had a Flemish architect who supervised the wood sawing on Gresham’s estate at Ringshall near Ipswich and at Battisford Tye.   There can still be seen today traces of these saw mills.  Slates were bought at Dort.

There was a desire for better building with more comfort, convenience, doors and windows fitting tightly and any fireplaces to no longer disgorge smoke into rooms.    Better design and quality of interior walls, floors and ceiling finishes.  Demands could only be met by a thorough overhaul of traditional craft skills and building trades development, so therefore Flemish workers were employed.

In the late fifteenth century, architects , mainly in Rome, Florence and Venice turned back for inspiration of the Classical Orders of Architecture and the Romans.  These classical influences reached Britain by the Low Countries and symmetry in composition of cornices, columns and pilasters that ancient Roman had adapted from the Greeks.

Thomas Gresham laid the first brick on the 7th June, 1566.

Principal characteristics adopted were of a symmetrical plan, large flat headed window openings, sub-divided by stone mullions filled with lead glazing.  Walls of stone or red brick had some imitation of classical cornice and pilasters.   Due to the size and number of windows, the walls were often little more than banded piers of brick or stone, stabilized by internal cross walls or just by their generous thickness.  Floors and walls were of hard wood and the roof slated.

Important skills needed were:

Carpenters for structural work.

Joiners for finer, more accurate work for non-structural furnishings

Plasterers who could use their “stucco” art on common brickwork to imitate costly stone or decorate cornices or mouldings.

It is thought that crushed oyster shells were added to mortar to give extra strength and buildings were usually three or four storeys high.

The building of the Royal Exchange pushed on too fast for solidity and was slated by November 1567 and finished.  Thought to resemble the Bourse in Antwerp but it is believed the Gresham’s architect closely followed the bourse in Venice.   It was a long four storeyed building with a high double balcony, a bell tower with Gresham’s grasshopper above the north entrance and on one side of the main entrance, overlooking the quadrangle.    Each corner of the building and peak of each dormer window was crowned with a grasshopper.  The brick building was later stuccoed over to imitate stone. Piazzas were inside for wet weather and the covered walks were adorned with kings.

The bell called for the merchants to the spot at 12 noon and at 6pm.

Thomas Gresham was aware of the political, religious and artistic temperature of the time and he insisted on royal statues of all monarchs to embellish The Royal Exchange.

Gresham’s statue stood near the north end of the west piazza and after the Great Fire of 1666, his statue was still there!

The piazza had marble pillars and above were a hundred small shops, many of which were unlet until Queen Elizabeth 1 visited in 1570, giving the building a lustre and made the new building fashionable.

Vaults were dug below but were dark, damp and valueless for storing merchandise.

Thomas Gresham added two additional floors to the original trading floor for retail selling, making the Royal Exchange the first shopping mall.

A German traveller, Mr. Hentzner, in 1598, said The Royal Exchange was “A stateliness building and assemblage of different nations and quantities of merchandise.

Royal Exchanges:

  1. Original structure opened on 23rdJanuary, 1571 by Queen Elizabeth 1.
  2. Opened in 1669.   King Charles 2 laid the first stone at the base of the column on the west side of the north entrance and gave the workmen £20 in gold.  A week later the Duke of York, later James 2 laid the first stone at the base of the east column.  Edward Jarman was the architect.
  3. Opened on 23rdOctober, 1844 by Queen Victoria.   Prince Albert laid the foundation stone and Sir William Tite was the architect.

References:

British History Online.  The Royal Exchange.

Building in History. R. A. Stevens. ARIBA

Triumph of London. Stephen Alford.

Wikipedia.

Elisabeth

The Bourse in Antwerp and the Royal Exchange in London

Initially, I thought it would be a good idea to compare the two and spot the differences but there appear to be virtually no differences.  So, I had to spot the similarities instead and add a few miscellaneous bits!

Prior to 1515, the merchants in Antwerp used to meet in a large courtyard but then in 1515 the first exchange was built.   Prior to the Royal Exchange being built In London in 1568, the merchants and tradesmen used to meet twice a day in Lombard Street and Thomas Gresham complained that their meetings were ‘unpleasant and troublesome, by reason of walking and talking in an open narrow street’. By 1527 a chain had to be drawn across the top of the street during trading hours to keep order.

The first Bourse in Antwerp later became known as the old Bourse as by 1530 it was considered too small for the huge amount of business so in 1531 a new Bourse was built at a cost of 300,000 crowns. It was one of the wonders of Europe, a rectangular court with 38 decorated columns – all different, two great towers and four double doorways leading in from the streets.  Thomas Gresham knew this building well. It was symbolically at the heart of Antwerp and economically at the heart of Europe.

Gresham chose an Antwerp master mason, Hendrik Van Paesschen to design the Royal Exchange and he chose a design that was almost identical to that of the New Bourse in Antwerp which he so much admired. As it was funded mostly with his own money there does not appear to be any record of the actual cost of the building.  There was a quadrangle surrounded by 36 stone or marble Doric columns and a sheltered colonnade all round for shops and stalls on the ground floor as well as more shops on the two upper levels. In London everything was for sale from rare items to the most basic such as ‘mousetraps, birdcages, armour, books, gold, glass and even souvenirs and tourist guides to London. The Exchange wasn’t only for buying and selling. Formal deals were only done twice a day – as they were before in Lombard Street – and each session only lasted an hour but plenty of other activities were carried out.   Information was exchanged.  Posters were put up advertising services such as the successful cures performed by doctors and apothecaries. Beggars and thieves and organized criminals mingled with the wealthy.

In London there were rules but I haven’t found evidence that there were rules in Antwerp.  It’s possible that the population there was more law-abiding! In London only orange and lemon sellers were allowed to put their barrows by the main south entrance.  In 1590, women selling apples were arrested for ‘amusing themselves in cursing and swearing’. No weapons could be carried and no one could walk in the Exchange after 10 pm in summer and 9 pm in winter. Gangs of youths gathered to make trouble and laughed so loudly that church goers in St Bartholomew’s couldn’t hear the sermons.  In 1592 a tavern keeper who had vaults under the Exchange was fined for allowing tippling and for broiling herrings, sprats and bacon.  There were also complaints about rat catchers and sellers of dogs, birds etc. who hung around the gates.  Another source of irritation was parades advertising bull or bear baiting.  These were very noisy and included discordant minstrels and a bear with a monkey riding on its back.

There were strict fire precautions.  Feather makers were forbidden to keep ‘pans’ of fire in their shops.  There were precautions against dishonest practices amongst shopkeepers.  They were not allowed to use blinds in their windows which might obscure the shops and – oddly – ‘they were not allowed to throw false lights on the articles vended’ but I’m not sure what that means.

However, in 1665, during the Plague, they actually built fires at the two entrances to the Exchange apparently to ‘purify’ the air.  There was so little public business going on that grass grew in the quadrangle.

The poet Daniel Rogers wrote about the New Bourse as ‘a small world wherein all parts of the great world were united’ but these words could be equally applied to the Royal Exchange.

Penny Gamez

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tudor Navigation

 

Navigation is based largely on the spherical coordinates latitude -angular distance north or south of the equator – and longitude – angular distance east or west of a generally accepted reference location, such as the Greenwich Observatory. Finding longitude requires comparing local time, measured by a heavenly body, with the local time at a reference location, kept by a clock. Mechanical time-pieces existed in the Elizabethan era, but until the late eighteenth century they had to be corrected frequently by sun sightings and were therefore almost useless aboard ship. Measuring latitude, on the other hand, does not require an accurate time-piece. Refinement of instruments enabled sixteenth-century mariners to determine latitude with reasonable accuracy. Latitude was therefore extremely important to Elizabethan navigation.

Unable to use the latitude-longitude system to the fullest, sixteenth-century navigators supplemented latitude with a rho-theta (distance-and-bearing) system – dead (from deduced) reckoning. Beginning at a known or assumed position, the navigator measured, as best he could, the heading and speed of the ship, the speeds of the ocean currents and the leeward (downwind) drift of the ship, and the time spent on each heading. From this information he could compute the course he had made and the distance he had covered. Dead reckoning, through educated guesswork, is often very accurate. It is still practiced on ships and aircraft, and it lies at the heart of modern doppler and inertial navigational equipment. Errors tend to accumulate in dead reckoning, so its accuracy depends in part on the length of the voyage and the ability of the navigator to use latitude and other information to limit error. But above all else, dead reckoning depends on reliable instruments.

Latitude

Latitude was measured in the past either by measuring the altitude of the Sun at noon (the “noon sight”), or by measuring the altitudes of any other celestial body when crossing the meridian (reaching its maximum altitude when due north or south), and frequently by measuring the altitude of Polaris, the north star (assuming it is sufficiently visible above the horizon, which it is not in the Southern Hemisphere). Polaris always stays within 1 degree of the celestial north pole. If a navigator measures the angle to Polaris and finds it to be 10 degrees from the horizon, then he is about 10 degrees north of the equator. This approximate latitude is then corrected using simple tables or almanac corrections to determine a latitude theoretically accurate to within a fraction of a mile. Angles are measured from the horizon because locating the point directly overhead, the zenith, is not normally possible. When haze obscures the horizon, navigators use artificial horizons, which are horizontal mirrors of pans of reflective fluid, especially mercury historically. In the latter case, the angle between the reflected image in the mirror and the actual image of the object in the sky is exactly twice the required altitude.

The astrolabe was used to determine latitude by measuring the angle between the horizon and Polaris, also called the North Star, the Pole Star, or Stella Maris (Star of the Sea). Polaris was the preferred star for measuring latitude because it is less than one degree from the north celestial pole (the point in the heavens directly above the geographic north pole).

The cross-staff had developed from the tenth-century Arab kamal. It consisted of a square staff 3.5-4 feet in length, bearing a scale, with four sliding cross-pieces or transversals of graduated lengths. Only one transversal was used at a time, its selection being based upon the height of the heavenly body in the sky – the higher the body, the longer the transversal. The user held on end of the staff to his eye, then slid the transversal onto the far end and moved it back and forth until its upper and lower edges seemed to touch, respectively, the observed body and the horizon. The location of the transversal on the scale was converted by a table into degrees of latitude.

Polaris is often obscured by clouds, fog, or daylight, and it is below the horizon for anyone in the Southern Hemisphere. Darkness often makes the horizon hard to find. So navigators learned to use the astrolabe, quadrant, and cross-staff with the sun. A piece of smoked glass was frequently used to keep the user from blinding himself. Under lock and key, for use by the captain and pilot only, were highly prized declination tables or astronomical charts showing calculated heights of the sun above the equator at noon for every day of the year.

A variation of the cross staff is the backstaffBackstaff back staff, back-staff, Davis quadrant

A navigational instrument for measuring the altitude of the sun, introduced in the 16th century.
by John Davis

The backstaff, in its final form, was made of wood and was made up of two arcs, a larger 30° arc and a smaller 60° arc.

, navigators could tell time using a nocturnalNocturnal

An early instrument designed for measuring time of night by means of Polaris (the Pole Star) and other points in constellations., a device that measured the angle from the North Star to the pointer stars, either in Ursa Major (the Big Dipper or Big Bear) or in Ursa Minor (the Little Dipper or the Little Bear). It used the vertical as a reference, and required the month and date to be set

The Chinese are credited with the invention of the compass. They certainly used Lodestone from the 3rd century BC but for Feng Shui and geomancy. The use of a compass for navigation first recorded in 9th century AD. The navigational compass was introduced to Europe in 1190. By the 16th century the navigational compass consisted of a magnetised needle, the compass rose and mounted on gimbals to compensate for the pitching and rolling of the ship.The device enclosed in a n open topped box attached to a small cupboard called a bittacle (later binnacle). A piece of lodestone was carried as well to re magnetise the needle as required. Christopher Columbus first noted the difference between true north and magnetic north. Mathematical adjustments would also have to be made for this using the north star as a marker for true north

The picture on the right shows a traverse board which was used to calculate speed and course. The traverse board had a 32 point compass rose diagram with holes radiating out from the centre. Pegs were inserted every 30 mins to show the speed and course of the vessel. Traverse tables were then used to give the course over a 4 hour watch. After this period an entry was made in the ship’s log with comments about the weather the state of the sails and the crew.

After the hourglass has been turned 8 times a ‘watch’ has been completed.

The use of charts in navigation comes quite late and until printing became cheaper and the level of mathematical education improved they were not critical to navigation close to shore. The earliest nautical charts portolan charts dating from the 13th century of the Mediterrranean and the Black Sea. The name is derived from the Italian word portilano relating to harbours. The charts are a set of sailing directions there is no latitude or longitude but lines based on the 32 points of the nautical compass rose.

Pedro Nunes, a Portuguese navigator wrote a treatise called in defense of the Marine Chart and his ideas were developed by Thomas Harriot in the 1590s. He was a Cambridge mathematician who taught Walter Raleigh navigational skills before his departure to Roanoke. Imagine driving along a great circle you cannot drive in a straight line, you have to turn the wheel. A ship on a steady course does not follow a circle but a spiral (loxodrone or rhumb line). These principals were used by Mercator when he produced his charts using  Mercator projection. The charts use latitude and longitude (this could not be measured accurately until 18th century when Harrison designed his clock). The map gets distorted towards the poles look at the size of Green land. Edward Wright corrected the mathematical errors in 1599.

1584 Dutchman Wagsener produces ‘Waggoners’ practical sailing directions with charts, and tables able to be purchased.

Drake had made numerous trips to the Caribbean and was familiar with navigation in the West Indies. 5ships set sail from Plymouth in 1577 to intercept Spanish ships in the Isthmus of Panama on their return from Peru and Bolivia. Captured 26 tons of silver, ½ ton of gold, coins, jewels and jewellery. Unable to return via South America as Spanish waiting. Went north to California, Vancouver, Alaska unable to locate NW passage. Then sailed west to Japan across Pacific past NE coast of Australia to Indonesia and Spice islands, uploaded 6 tons of cloves. Then sailed SW to India, Madagasgar round Cape of Good Hope finally arriving back in Plymouth in September 1580. Cargo worth 160000 Elizabethan pounds (1/2 billion today) Queen Elizabeth’s share alone equalled half the national debt.

Gresham Almshouses

Less familiar than the Royal Exchange and Gresham College, another part of Sir Thomas Gresham’s legacy was a set of almshouses. Gresham had eight almshouses built in 1575 to the rear of his Bishopsgate mansion, facing on to Broad Street (now Old Broad Street) – the whole property located roughly where Tower 42 now stands. John Stow, writing just over 20 years later, referred to them as ‘eight proper alms houses, built of brick and timber’.

Gresham made his will in July that same year, 1575, and gave instructions that the almshouses were to be handed over to the Mayor and Commonality of the City of London. They were to choose eight ‘poor and impotent persons’ to occupy the almshouses, one in each house. (The will says ‘persons’, but it seems it meant ‘men’.) Each was to live rent free and to receive the annual sum of £6 13s 4d.

In 1666 the mansion, now housing Gresham College, and the almshouses narrowly escaped the Great Fire, as shown by Wenceslas Hollar’s 1667 map. Eighty years later, the property is marked on John Rocque’s map of 1746, but its days were numbered. In 1768 the college and almshouses were demolished to make way for a new Excise Office. The Office’s original building in Bartholomew Lane had been destroyed in the Great Fire and the Excise Office had moved for a while to Bloomsbury and then to a private house in Old Jewry. Now, with Gresham College in decline and the mansion in disrepair, the government issued a compulsory purchase order for the Bishopsgate site and built a grand new Revenue and Excise Office on it.

At this point the almshouses were moved to the lower end of Whitecross Street, an area now covered by part of the Barbican complex. The almshouses were placed in the Green Yard alongside the City stables, where the Lord Mayor’s coach was kept and where stray horses and cattle were housed. The place must have been constantly full of noise and bustle, not to mention smells and dirt! A map of 1819 also shows the new Debtors Prison (built to take the overspill from Newgate) on the other side of Whitecross Street, so it was hardly the most desirable area. A print of about 1850 shows the almshouses in a neat courtyard, but John William Burgon in his 1839 biography of Thomas Gresham says that the almshouses ‘form so indifferent a substitute for the eight little tenements contrived by Sir Thomas Gresham, that it may reasonably be questioned whether their founder would admire the change, could he rise from his grave to witness it’.

It was not until the 1880s that the residents’ lot was improved, when the almshouses were moved out of the City to Brixton. Back in the 1830s, a group of City gentlemen had decided that a suitable way to mark the passing of the 1832 Reform Act would be to build some almshouses ‘to afford a permanent asylum to aged and decayed freemen and householders of London, and their wives or widows, of good character and repute’. They raised a subscription, with the City Corporation giving £1,500, and bought a large piece of land in Brixton, then still a relatively rural area but just beginning to be developed. There the trustees built 16 houses for a total of 31 residents, but then the money ran out. Eventually, in 1848, the trustees handed over the land and houses to the City Corporation.

In 1854 the City of London Freemen’s School was built nearby, and two years later another group of almshouses was added, this time replacing Rogers’ Almshouses that had stood near St Giles Cripplegate. Then, in 1882, the City built eight new Gresham Almshouses on the site and demolished the old ones in Whitecross Street. The new ones formed a one-storey terrace built in a sort of Jacobean style of red brick with stone dressings.

In 1884 the original 16 houses on the site were rebuilt, and all three sets of almshouses are still there today. Built to different designs and all listed, they stand on three sides of a large area of grass and trees on Ferndale Road, a street that was itself created in 1882 when Brixton was being extensively developed. Today the almshouses form a green oasis in a heavily built-up area.

The almshouses are now administered by the City of London Almshouses Trust and offer sheltered accommodation to people aged 66 and over on low incomes or state benefits. A few of the residents still come from the City but most now come from Lambeth or other parts of Greater London.

Sir Thomas Gresham’s will: https://www.taieb.net/auteurs/Gresham/

Hollar’s 1667 ‘Exact Surveigh’ of the City of London: https://www.british-history.ac.uk/no-series/london-map-leake/1667/map

John Rocque’s 1746 map: https://www.locatinglondon.org

William Faden 1819 map: http://www.romanticlondon.org/the-1819-plan/

Gresham’s Almshouses, Whitecross Street (illustration): https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/collection_online/collection_object_details/collection_image_gallery.aspx?assetId=755178001&objectId=3243407&partId=1

City of London and Gresham Almshouses: http://www.londongardensonline.org.uk/gardens-online-record.php?ID=LAM008

Ferndale Road area, Brixton: https://www.british-history.ac.uk/survey-london/vol26/pp95-100

The City of London Almshouses Trust: https://www.cityoflondon.gov.uk/services/housing/older-people-housing/Pages/almshouses-trust.aspx

Gresham Almshouses today (photos): https://www.flickr.com/groups/cityoflondonhistory

Carol

The Muscovy Company

Muscovy Street, running between Trinity Square and Seething Lane, was created a hundred years ago, when the area was redeveloped and the huge Port of London Authority building was constructed. A century earlier, an 1819 map shows Muscovy Court on the PLA site, with Seething Lane largely given over to East India warehouses. The John Rocque 1746 map also has Muscovy Court, but no warehouses – instead, on the east side of Seething Lane is the Navy Office, where Samuel Pepys lived and worked in the 17th century. Going back a further century and near the top of Seething Lane, opposite St Olave’s church, was a large property that in 1564 became the headquarters of the Muscovy Company.

It was never planned to be called the Muscovy Company – that came about by accident.

In the early 1550s, the English cloth trade was all going through Antwerp, but over-production was causing the market to become saturated and prices were dropping. Needless to say, the merchants were unhappy at this and wanted new markets for their cloth. There was also a desire on a political as well as a business level to emulate Spain and Portugal, which had both grown rich on gold and silver from South America and spices from the East Indies. The big idea, in an age of exploration, was to find a route to Cathay, the land to the north of China, ruled by the Great Khan and believed to be a source of untold wealth in precious stones, silks, spices and so on. Many said there must be a quicker and easier route to Asia than the one used by the Portuguese that went south and around the Cape of Good Hope. The belief was that there was a north-east passage around Norway and through the Arctic oceans.

What was needed was someone with the energy and expertise to make such a project happen. Enter Sebastian Cabot.

Italian-born, he was the son of John Cabot, alias Giovanni Caboto, a renowned navigator and explorer who had spent time in Spain, then came to England, specifically Bristol. Among other exploits, in 1497 he led an expedition commissioned by Henry VII and funded by the Merchant Venturers of Bristol that discovered the coast of North America. Sebastian followed his father’s example and in 1508/9 led one of the first expeditions to search for a north-west passage to Asia through North America.

After spending the best part of 30 years in Spain, leading expeditions to South America and training navigators, in 1547 Sebastian Cabot came to England, actively recruited by Edward VI’s government and paid a generous annual pension. In 1551 he put together a trading company with the aim of finding the north-east passage. This was to be an early joint stock company, where the capital remained with the company rather than being paid back after each voyage. Around 240 merchants and powerful people invested in the Company of Merchant Adventurers to New Lands, among them Sir John Gresham.

The £6,000 raised was used to pay for three new ships, crews and supplies for over a hundred men on a lengthy voyage. Cabot was not to go on the expedition – by now he was around 70 years of age. The leader was to be Sir Hugh Willoughby, a distinguished soldier though with no naval experience. His second-in-command and chief navigator was Richard Chancellor, an experienced mariner from Bristol. Willoughby was to sail on the Bona Esperanza and Chancellor on the Edward Bonaventure (always a good ploy to name a ship after the monarch); the third ship was the Bona Confidentia. The new company was to due to receive a royal charter before departing, but King Edward was too ill to sign and seal it.

On 10 May 1553 the three ships set sail from Deptford, pausing at Greenwich to fire their cannons to salute the King, though Edward was unable to watch – he died just two months later. Unfavourable winds delayed the ships’ progress northward and it was the end of July before they reached the north of Norway. There they encountered terrible storms and the ships were separated. A meeting-place had been agreed in case of separation and Chancellor was able to make his way there on the Edward Bonaventure. However, Willoughby and the other two ships never arrived. They had taken refuge in a bay where they became frozen in and all those aboard perished; they were only discovered the following spring. It was assumed that everyone had died of cold and hunger, though they had had plenty of stores and warm clothing aboard. A more recent theory is that they collected sea coal to burn in the enclosed interior of the ships, where they died of carbon monoxide poisoning.

Chancellor waited for seven days at the meeting-place, then continued alone. Eventually he found the entrance to the White Sea, a large inlet of the Barents Sea, where he moored at the mouth of a river near what is now the port of Archangel. This was Russia, also known as Muscovy from its capital, Moscow. Chancellor and his crew were the first Englishmen to set foot in Russia and they made contact with some local inhabitants, who sent a message to Moscow about the new arrivals. Chancellor was invited to make the arduous 600-mile journey overland to the capital by the Tsar, Ivan IV – later known as Ivan the Terrible – to whom he presented a letter of introduction from the King. The Tsar entertained his visitor in lavish style in his luxurious palace, a building in stark contrast to the primitive wooden houses that constituted the rest of Moscow. In due course a deal was done between Chancellor and the Tsar, giving the company exclusive trading privileges and opening a trading route to England and other countries for the Russians.

After a lengthy stay, Chancellor returned to England in the summer of 1554. The idea of reaching Cathay was set aside as there was plenty to be gained from trading with Russia – furs, seal oil, tallow, cordage and more. The new monarchs, Mary and her husband Philip of Spain, issued a new royal charter to what was now renamed the Muscovy Company, with Sebastian Cabot as its governor.

Chancellor made the journey to Russia again the following year and spent the summer organising trading and having warehouses built in Moscow. The company was to be given exemption from tolls and customs, a status resembling that enjoyed by the Hanseatic League in London.

Unhappily, Chancellor’s voyage home in 1556 proved disastrous. Willoughby’s two ships had been retrieved and joined up with Chancellor’s two, but violent storms caused two ships to be lost and a third to take refuge for the winter at Trondheim. Chancellor’s ship, carrying the first Russian ambassador to England, continued but then foundered on the coast of Scotland. The ambassador was rescued, but Chancellor and most of his crew drowned.

Sebastian Cabot died in 1557, but the Muscovy Company thrived. In 1564 it moved from its first base on Thames Street, near the quayside and Custom House, to its grand new headquarters in Seething Lane, and it held a monopoly on Anglo-Russian trade until 1698. In Russia it continued in existence until the 1917 Revolution, since when it has operated there mainly as a charity.

1819 William Faden map: http://www.romanticlondon.org/the-1819-plan/

1746 John Rocque map: https://www.locatinglondon.org

Encyclopedia Arctica biographies:

Richard Chancellor https://collections.dartmouth.edu/arctica-beta/html/EA15-16.html

Sir Hugh Willoughby https://collections.dartmouth.edu/arctica-beta/html/EA15-79.html

photo: wiki

Carol

 

 

The Steelyard and the Hanseatic League

Hansa Almaniae (a German Hansa) was first mentioned in English records in 1282. The word Hanse comes from the Germanic word ‘hanso’ meaning a group and in Old German meant a group of warriors.  The origins of the word Steelyard appear to be hotly contested. In German ‘stahl’ means solid and hard and ‘hof’ means a courtyard but others favour the word coming from a steel yard i.e. a balance with two unequal arms.  The object to be weighed was suspended from the shorter arm and weights added to the longer arm until the ‘yard’ was horizontal.

The origins of the area later called the Steelyard go back to Saxon times when foreign merchants – encouraged by English kings – traded with England. The earliest traders were Norman wine merchants from Rouen who were established beside the Thames near today’s Dowgate Hill in AD960 from where they could sail their barges up the River Walbrook and into the City.

Later other merchants from Cologne – known as Easterlings – were also established on the site.  Henry II granted them privileges and by 1157 the merchants from Cologne had displaced those from Scandinavia.  The Danish merchants sold their land and guildhall at Dowgate to the Germans.

King Richard I and King John gave the merchants a charter freeing them from paying rent and allowing them to trade throughout the country. In return – either then or maybe in a later charter –  they had to look after the repair of Bishopsgate gate and may have had to lend their ships to the Crown in times of war.

In 13th century the future Steelyard became a group of warehouses with a guildhall and the Hanse merchants lived and worked in and around the area.  At first they lived an almost monastic life – no marriage – women were not allowed inside – and the merchants had to be inside the walls by a fixed time each night. They drank their own Rhenish wine, elected their own aldermen, and didn’t allow games to be played with Englishmen in case quarrels started.

In 1303 another charter from Edward I confirmed the tax and customs concessions.  This gave rise to constant friction with the English merchants who were obliged to give fivepence in every pound to the Crown whereas the Hansa only had to give threepence.

In 1475 the Hanseatic League purchased the 3 acre London site outright and it then became known as the Steelyard. The main trade was in gold and silver, fish, timber, hides and furs, linen, wool, grain, wax, ashes, tar and pitch.

In 1552 King Edward VI abolished the ancient privileges of the Hanse merchants but the merchants continued to live there until they were banished by Elizabeth I in 1598. The hall was eventually turned into a naval storehouse but the Steelyard was destroyed in the Great Fire.  After this disaster some German merchants rebuilt their houses and operated in the area until their premises and Steelyard Lane were sold to the Victoria Dock Company in 1853.  Cannon Street Station was built on the site in 1865.

Holbein the Younger Holbein knew some of the Hanse merchants very well and painted their portraits as rich, confident young men. His Steelyard murals were very different.  They were allegorical and morally challenging. The ‘Triumph of Riches’  showed Plutus, the Roman god of riches, elderly and stooped and enthroned on a chariot piled high with treasure. But all is not as it seems. Fortune with her eyes blindfolded is throwing out gold pieces and Nemesis, the avenger, is hovering above. In the procession are the figures of Cleopatra, Croesus, Midas and Tantalus.

The ‘Triumph of Poverty’ showed Poverty personified as a woman raggedly dressed, sitting in a rickety cart, leading a rabble of artisans, labourers and vagabonds. The two inscriptions read: ‘He who is rich …fears hourly that the inconstant wheel of fortune may turn’ and ‘Gold is the father of blandishment and the author of sorrow.  Whoever lacks it dies, whoever keeps it, fears it.’

Penny Gamez

Holbein image Wiki

 

 

 

The Workhouse

The Workhouse: Its development and responsibility towards Children in The City of London from 17th Century Onwards

Whose was the responsibility of the Orphans, Destitute and Hapless?

This was the burning question after the dissolution and demise of the Monasteries.

Elizabethan England was also challenged by the increase in population, enclosures and the migration of population into the towns and cities from rural areas seeking employment.

This created many social problems. – crime, homelessness and extreme poverty, all of which needed to be tackled.

In 1601 Act of Relief of the Poor, was the effort to consolidate all previous attempts

of sorting the social problems of the time.   One of its main tenets was for the Parishes of Communities to get together, one or two, or more to provide work for the poor, and also care and ‘reception and breeding up of poor fatherless or motherless

Infants.’  There was a choice for the needy: to do outwork in their own homes or carry it out in the Workhouses. This challenge to look after the poor and their children was dependent upon the charitable funds of Parishes and individuals.

With reference to the parishes of the City of London, this could sometimes be a huge burden, particularly where the parish had a small community.

Over time, because of complaints from the parishes, the scheme of ‘outwork ‘was dropped and workhouses became more or less residential in nature.

The London Corporation of the Poor 1647 established underAn Ordinances for the Relief and Employment of the Poor and the Punishment of Vagrants and other disorderly Persons” stated that the Corporations were to erect Workhouses “to employ all poor children, beggars and vagrants, Idle and disorderly”

The Corporation would now also have responsibilities as well as parishes.  The Corporation could help with leasing of land or buildings within the city.

It would help also fund care of poor through funds raised annually. These funds would be supplemented by private charities and from monies raised by the work of the poor and needy, including the children.

In 1660 the Corporations activities with regard to provision for the poor came to halt with the restoration of Charles II.  Firstly, he took back his royal properties.(cf. Heydon House, Minories and Wardrobe building,Vintry) Shortages of funds and the catastrophe of the Plague and Great Fire in 1666 were to blame for lack of activity.

In 1698 a further Act revived the efforts of the Corporation to meet the challenge of the poorest and needy.  Efforts were costly but nonetheless    The Bishopsgate Work House was established.  It was large and included provision for 400 children.as well as adults.

To facilitate the organisations of the Workhouse, all poor children were categorised; for example

  1. Families with large numbers of children, with reduced circumstances, who by misfortune cannot provide for themselves
  2. Parish children
  • Children of seamen or soldiers in the Queen’s service.

Children would be working at various jobs, e.g. cleaning, sewing, spinning wool or flax.  There was a commitment to provide religious education and lessons in reading and writing for them. This picture of joint cooperation between parishes and corporation was to change over the years and by 1834 there were no city parishes running workhouses. The next turning point in the story is the Poor Law Act of 1834. 

Children featured very little in the Poor Law Amendment Act. This was surprising when by 1839 half of the work house population in England were children. Children were categorised as being females under 16 years– ‘girls’ and males under 13 years– ‘boys’. Those under 7 years old were a separate class-they usually stayed with their mother.  Parents were allowed to see their children daily for a short time or occasionally if the children were in a different workhouse.  Those children without parents would have legal guardians until they were old enough to enter employment.  Girls would often go into domestic work and boys into local work or Army/Navy.

Conditions in the 19th workhouse were often appalling, and a Poor Law Commission in one of its annual reviews when viewing the Whitechapel Workhouse, commented on the overcrowding of 2 and 3 year olds, where they were confined to one room and rarely went outside for air or exercise.

Schooling of children would either be in the workhouse school, district school or charity school and sometimes for boys a training ship.

The use of Corporal Punishment on children in the workhouse was governed by strict rules, laid down by the Poor Law Commission of 1834.  However, there were many reports of abuse and infringements within the workhouses and the schools which they attended.

Poor Law Commissioners set up 3 Unions, City of London Union, the East London Union and the West London Union. The City of London Union came into being in 1837. It was overseen by an elected board of Guardians,101 in total and representing 98 parishes within the City.  The Union was persuaded to build a purpose Built workhouse for 800 inmates. In 1849 the Bow Street Work house was built at a cost of £55,000, with central Heating and large dining hall and chapel. It marked a new era where responsibility for the underclasses had become more centralised, not only in terms of governance but also in terms providing shelter, schooling and work.  No longer were indoor paupers, farmed out to private contractors at great expense.

By 1869, The Bow Street Workhouse had become an infirmary for the larger union of the East London and City of London combined.

The East London site being in Homerton.  By 1909 the City of London had decided to vacate the Bow Street site in favour of

substantially enlarging The East London Work house.

  1. Source:  Peter Higgenbottom  http://www.workhouses.org.uk/CityOfLondon
  2. John Strype: 1720 Survey of Cities Of London and Westminster for descriptions of Workhouse conditions for children.

Parish Workhouses in the Old City of London Pre-1834

St Andrews Wardrobe 1776

St. Ann Blackfriars 1734

St Ann & St Agnes 1730 –  28 inmates

St. Batholomew the Great 1737

St. Botolph Aldersgate 1820- 240 inmates @ 129 Aldersgate

St. Botolph Aldgate

St.Botolph without Bishopsgate 1820 – Poor House – Rose Alley  Workhouse in Dunning Alley

St. Brides Fleet Street 1731 – 82 people, 30 children under age of 9

St. Dunstan in the East 1731 – 12 children, parish house nr church (formerly a wine merchant)

St. Dunstan in the West – 30 adults, 26 children, in a new house. 21 daily sent to

Charity school/to work only out of school hours

St. Ethelburga Bishopsgate – 48 inmates in workhouse

St.Giles Cripplegate

  1. Workhouse; new build on Bunhill fields leased from City. 1724 – 110 old men & women, 53 boys & girls, Picking Ockham, spinning & knitting.
  2. Workhouse; 35 Boys & Girls: 66 Women & men (Demolished in 1843)

St. Helen’s Bishopsgate 1734

St. Katharine by the Tower 1725 by 1776, 45 inmate

St. Katherine Cree – 45 inmates

St. Lawrence Jewry 1731 – A large house in Grub St. with 4+ 8 children.   Children go to ward school in Cripplegate

St. Martin Ludgate 1731 – House leased for 21 years as workhouse (Creed Lane)

St. Mary Aldermanbury 1730

St. Mary Le Bow Cheapside 1731 – ‘much burdened by the poor’-hired house

St. Michael Cornhill 1732

St. Sepulchre without Newgate

St. Olave hart St. 1737

St. Martin Vintry 1727 – A house for 6 adults/4 children who went to charity school in Cordwainer ward

St. Leonard Foster Lane 1776 – 100 Inmates in Leased Premises

St. Peter Cornhill 1732

Mary

City of London School

The City of London School is an independent day school for boys, a partner of the City of London School for Girls and the City of London Freemen’s School, both of which came later. All three receive funding from the City’s Cash.

The boys’ school was founded in 1834, but it owes its existence to a bequest by John Carpenter, a Town Clerk of London who died nearly four centuries earlier, in 1442. Carpenter’s will included many bequests, none of them listed as for the education of City boys, but one parcel of land was left to two friends who knew he wanted to support children. The land was passed on to John Don, an influential Londoner, who left it in his own will with the stipulation that it be used to support and educate four poor children at a time. The four boys became known as Carpenter’s Children. The bequest was administered over the centuries by the City Corporation, until a report in 1823 by the Charities Commission revealed that the income far exceeded the costs of supporting the boys. Discussions led to the idea of setting up a school to educate the largest possible number of boys, not just poor ones, and a search for a location began. The original proposal to take over a disused workhouse fell through, but eventually a site was found just off Cheapside after the closure of Honey Lane Market on Milk Street. In 1834 an Act of Parliament founded the City of London School for 400 boys, to be maintained by the City Corporation. The new school was opened in 1837 and was remarkable for its time in several respects: it did not discriminate on grounds of religion; it was a day school not a boarding school; and its practical and progressive curriculum included science and commercial subjects.

By the 1870s the school had outgrown its original site and in 1883 it moved into a new building on Victoria Embankment near Blackfriars Bridge. The road alongside it was named John Carpenter Street in honour of the man regarded as the school’s founder. During the Second World War the staff and pupils were evacuated to Marlborough College in Wiltshire, but they were able to return in 1944 to an undamaged building. (The building is still there, though now occupied by the investment bank JP Morgan.)

Through the years the school was extended and modernised, but overcrowding became a problem and new premises were needed. In 1986 the school moved into a new, purpose-built facility in Queen Victoria Street, just below St Paul’s, opposite the College of Arms and close to the Millennium Bridge.

Notable old boys, known as Old Citizens, include writers Kingsley Amis and Julian Barnes, England cricketer Mike Brearley, Nobel Prize-winning physicist Peter Higgs and actor Daniel Radcliffe.

City of London Freemen’s School

Although the original idea to convert the workhouse came to nothing, there were those who still wanted a school for poor children. It took two more decades, but finally, in 1854, the Freemen’s Orphanage School was founded specifically, as the name suggests, for orphans of freemen of the City. Orphan children can still be educated as ‘Foundationers’ at the school, paid for by the City Corporation. The school was set up not in the City but in Brixton, south London. In 1906 it moved out to Ashtead Park in Surrey where today, under the name of the City of London Freemen’s School, it is a coeducational private school for day and boarding pupils. Notable alumni, known as Old Freemen, include actor Warwick Davis, Joe Strummer of the Clash, and artist Gavin Turk.

City of London School for Girls

The girls’ school was the last to be established, founded in 1894 using a bequest of William Ward, a prosperous businessman of Brixton. Ward died in 1881 and, having no children, left his fortune to charitable causes. Believing strongly that girls should receive an academic education, he bequeathed £20,000 to the City Corporation to fund a girls’ school. This was established in Carmelite Street, close to the boys’ school on Victoria Embankment. Beginning with 53 pupils, the school gradually expanded, then after World War Two numbers rose rapidly. The building was no longer big enough, but the Head was adamant that the school should remain in the City. Eventually, in the early 1960s planning permission was given for a new school to be built within the Barbican; it opened in September 1969. The school has an outstanding academic reputation and is also very strong in extracurricular activities, particularly the arts and music. Notable former pupils include the singer Dido, journalist Clare Rayner, TV presenter Claudia Winkleman, and historian and writer Alison Weir.

 

Carol

 

 

The Foundling Hospital and its historical context

I should like to start with a quote:

“Foundlings are not to be received in our house, for if we were to receive them, such children would pour in with such an abundance that there would be insufficient goods to care for them.  And what is more, the care of such children does not pertain to us but falls to the parish churches.  Orphans, however, shall receive care until the age of 10.”

Sounds vaguely familiar?  Well, this was the new Rule for the Hotel Dieu in Troyes, France, written in 1262!  It tells us that that not only have foundlings been a problem for a long time, but also that mediaeval “hospitals” differentiated between orphans and foundlings.

It made me wonder if there were similar changes in society leading to an increase in “foundlings” in both cities.  Indeed, there were population changes in 13th century Paris akin to what was happening in 18th century London.  There was a massive influx of poor workers into Paris – in fact in 1292 62% of the female population had been born outside Paris. They worked mainly in the textile industry, but also were driven into prostitution.  Because of this, the social networks that would previously have helped them cope with an un-planned pregnancy in their local community were absent or poorly formed.

Similarly, the population of London doubled in the 100 years before the Foundling Hospital opened and then tripled again in the next 100 years.  In 1720, 50% of all unmarried women in London aged 16-25 were in domestic service, and this group accounted for 70% of the women charged with infanticide at the Old Bailey.  These young women were particularly at risk for two reasons:  the proximity to their master and his son, and secondly due to contemporary the tendency to marry late, having amassed a small amount of savings.  (It should be noted that a married woman was charged with murder, not infanticide.)  Infanticide was said to be more common than abandonment because it was thought to be emotionally more difficult to leave a crying baby than to smother it.  It was punishable by hanging.  So, it is hardly surprising that they rushed to Thomas Coram’s hospital as soon as they had the chance.

 

 

This led me to ask – “Why was an illegitimate child such a problem?”.  There seemed to be three factors:

First, the Church – marriage was to be preserved for a stable society, it was specifically there to contain sexual desires.  Also, women were always the ones at fault: “The woman whom thou gavest to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I did eat.”  Also, I think the Bible instructs followers to care for widows and orphans, not bastards.

Secondly, the State.  The Poor relief system tended to lay the responsibility for care of the child on the mother.  This was made specific in the 1834 changes and the Bastardy Act.  A servant with an illegitimate baby was almost certainly now out of a job and so was reliant on the parish – and latterly that meant the workhouse, rather than out-door relief.  This usually meant death for the baby, if not the mother as well.

Thirdly, “society”.  The disgrace that being an unmarried mother incurred, led the Foundling Hospital to state that one of its main roles was the “re-habilitation” of fallen women by taking their child from them.  The mother could return to society washed of this sin and relieved of this encumbrance and able to work for her living.  The disgrace of their mothers was something of which the Foundlings were frequently remined.  They could only expect the lowliest work and a servile place in society because of her failing.

 

Throughout my reading about the Foundling hospital I have been struck by the double standards displayed.  It seems to me a classic example of cognitive dissonance:  – The man is aware of his guilt but cannot accept that guilt because of his status in society and so must blame the woman and also take little responsibility for his child.  If this is so, then it is a problem as old as patriarchal society itself.  What do you think?

 

Tim Heath

Principal sources-

London’s Forgotten Children – Gillian Pugh

Crime and Punishment in 18th Century England – Frank Mc Lynn

Lost but not yet found: Medieval foundlings and their care in northern France 1200-1500 –          Anne Lester, Journal of the Western Society for French History. 35, 2007

Growing up in 12th-century London

Thomas Becket grew up in London in the 12th century, though his childhood wasn’t typical of the majority of London children because of his middle-class family background. His parents, Gilbert and Matilda, came from Normandy and settled in London in 1110; they were recently married and around 20 years old. Gilbert was a trader, possibly a mercer, and he also acquired property that he rented out. He became a prosperous and significant member of London society, and would later serve as a City sheriff.

The family home was a large property fronting on to Cheapside and stretching back roughly where Mercers’ Hall lies today. Thomas was born there in about 1120 on 21 December, the Feast Day of St Thomas the Apostle – hence his name. Babies were usually baptised a few days after birth, but it seems Thomas was baptised the same day, which may indicate that he was weak or sickly. Luckily there was a church right next door, St Mary Colechurch.

Thomas had three sisters, Agnes, Rose and Mary, though it’s not clear what their relative ages were. Agnes and Rose both married and had families, and Agnes would later inherit the Becket family home. Mary became a nun and after Thomas’s murder was appointed abbess of Barking Abbey.

At home the family would have spoken French among themselves, but Thomas would have picked up English easily – the household servants were English speakers and the busy street market of Cheapside was literally on their doorstep.

Thomas’s education began at home, where he learnt his ABC and how to count on an abacus, most likely taught by his mother. She was a very pious woman, devoted to the cult of the Virgin Mary, and she took him to church regularly, taught him his prayers and showed him the virtue of giving alms to the poor. Around the age of seven, Thomas may have gone to a parish school or ‘song school’, where the priest taught the choristers basic literacy.

When he was about 10, Thomas was sent away to boarding school at Merton Priory. This was an Augustinian priory that had been founded only 15 or so years earlier by the Norman sheriff of Surrey. It was located by the river Wandle and was a collection of mainly wooden buildings, though in the process of being rebuilt in stone. Thomas’s schoolmates would have come from similar backgrounds to his, and they spent most of their time studying Latin. Learning by memorising and repetition, they studied every aspect of Latin grammar and made translations from Latin to English and back again. It seems Thomas was intelligent and quick-witted and had an excellent memory, but he doesn’t seem to have been a hard worker – he probably did the minimum necessary and coasted through classes.

After a year or two he returned home and began attending a grammar school. At that time there were three to choose from, attached to the major churches: St Paul’s, St Martin le Grand and St Mary le Bow. It’s not known where Thomas went – he may have attended any or all of them; they were all within easy walking distance.

The basic grammar school curriculum was the three subjects known as the trivium: grammar, logic and rhetoric. Grammar was obviously the mechanics of language. Logic was the art of thinking and reasoning, identifying false arguments and debating. Rhetoric was the most important subject for anyone going on to a career: it was about communicating by public speaking, and by reading and composing and dictating responses to documents. Most people would not have written their own documents but would have dictated them to a professional scribe. Thomas certainly learned to write at some point, but writing didn’t go hand in hand with reading. Making temporary notes with a stylus on a wax tablet was one thing, but writing documents to be retained involved a whole set of skills: preparing the parchment, sharpening quills to use as pens, making up ink, and mastering the tricky art of forming letters with a quill pen.

Following on from the trivium came the quadrivium, four more subjects that Thomas may have studied at some level: astronomy, arithmetic, geometry and music.

But life wasn’t all work and no play – quite the opposite, as we can learn from a document written in the 1170s (after Thomas’s murder and canonisation) by William Fitzstephen, a Londoner who had been Thomas’s clerk for many years. He wrote a biography of his former master, prefaced with a description of London that offers many snippets of authentic-sounding information. In this he describes how, on Shrove Tuesday, schoolboys were allowed to take fighting cocks to school and spend the morning holding cock fights. Then after lunch, all the city youth – both students and workers – went out into the fields to play ball games, while older citizens watched them at play.

In winter, the marshland outside the walls at Moorfields would freeze over and William describes how large numbers of youngsters would go out and play on the ice. They would run to get up speed and then slide long distances; they would make seats out of slabs of ice and be dragged along by chains of friends holding hands; and they would strap animal bones to their feet and skate over the ice, sometimes using poles with metal tips to propel themselves along and charge into each other. Needless to say, there were plenty of falls, bruises and broken bones.

Something potentially even more dangerous took place at Smithfield where every Friday there was a horse fair and boys like Thomas could help show off horses by racing them around the field. Thomas definitely enjoyed riding and he spent several summer holidays in Sussex at Pevensey Castle, the home of a friend of his father, a Norman named Richer de l’Aigle. They would go out hunting and hawking together nearly every day. As well as being an excellent rider, Thomas took great pleasure in falconry and later in life he became renowned for the mews where he kept his birds.

After his time at grammar school, Thomas spent a year or so in Paris, ostensibly studying law but more likely having a good time. He returned home after his mother died and after a while, aged about 21, began his working life as a clerk. As he advanced to become a clerk to the Archbishop of Canterbury and then Chancellor to Henry II, he continued as he’d grown up, making his way by using his intelligence and personal charisma and enjoying a thoroughly lavish lifestyle. It was only when he was appointed Archbishop himself that he changed his ways.

Sources

John Guy, Thomas Becket: Warrior, Priest, Rebel, Victim (Viking, 2012)

Merton Priory: https://www.mertonpriory.org

William Fitzstephen, Description of London – written in the 1170s, reprinted in John Stow’s Survey of London, or available online at http://users.trytel.com/~tristan/towns/florilegium/introduction/intro01.html

image http://www.medievalists.net

Carol

 

British Camp Fire Girls Association

I visited the Museum of Childhood, Bethnal Green with a particular interest to see what, if anything, it had relating to youth movements.  All I could find was a small section of one display case which was devoted to uniforms.  There was a Boy’s Brigade uniform, a Boy Scout uniform and between them a Native American woman’s dress which the caption described as a Camp Fire Girl’s ceremonial gown, 1922-1929.  Never having heard of the Camp Fire Girls I decided to find something about them.

The Camp Fire Girls were founded in the United States by Dr Luther Gulick and his wife Charlotte in 1910.  Its purpose and aims were similar to those of the Girl Guides movement founded by Robert Baden-Powell and his sister Agnes in Britain in the same year.  The major difference was that Camp Fire was based on a romantic version of Native American culture, whereas Guides was organised more along militaristic lines.  Consequently Camp Fire placed a far stronger emphasis on woodcraft and camping and did little in the way of marching and parades.  The British Camp Fire Girls Association was officially founded in 1921, although there were groups in the UK inspired by the Camp Fire Girls of America for some years before then.  There is a photograph of Ruth Clark wearing Native American dress and standing outside a tepee which was taken in 1914 and which her boyfriend John Hargrave took with him to the Dardanelles campaign.  Ruth married Hargrave, a son of a Quaker and a pacifist, who had served as a non-combatant in the Royal Army Medical Corps, in 1919.  At that time he was Boy Scout Commissioner for Woodcraft and Camping and she was a member of a Camp Fire Girls group at the Garden School run by the Theosophical Educational Trust in St John’s Wood.  On 18 August 1920 they were among the founders of the Kibbo Kift and in January 1921 Hargrave was formally expelled from the Scout movement.  He had long been at loggerheads with Baden-Powell over what he perceived as militaristic and imperialist strands in scouting.  Logically he admired the Camp Fire Girls for their commitment to open-air campcraft and their devotion to nature, qualities he demanded in his Kibbo Kift movement.  The Camp Fire Girls and other woodcraft enthusiasts such as those who left the Scouts to join the Kibbo Kift all took Native American names.  John Hargrave was called White Fox and Ruth Clark Minobi, which means Glad Heart.

There is some more information about the gown in the Collections section of the V & A website.  It belonged to Sybil Vincent, who donated it to the museum.  In theory at least the girls made their gowns themselves.  The triangle on the front shows the emblem of the group (known as the Camp) to which the girl belonged.  The wooden beads are the equivalent of a Girl Guide’s badges and were awarded as honours in home craft, health craft, camp craft, hand craft, nature craft, business craft and citizenship.  The Camp Fire Girls membership badge carried the word Wohelo, which sounds Native American but is really a kind of acronym for work, health and love, the key elements of the movement’s philosophy.  Membership was grouped by age.  The Horizon League was for girls aged eleven and over, the Bluebirds for younger girls.  Camp leaders were known as Guardians.

Sybil Vincent and a group of friends from Croydon High School formed a Camp, known as Camp Keema, with her older sister as Guardian.  The name Camp Keema, which means the camp that faces the wind, was taken from the novels for girls by Elsie J. Oxenham, who was herself a Camp Fire Guardian when living in Ealing in the 1920s.  Later she moved to Worthing where she tried but failed to set up a Camp Fire Girls Camp largely because the Girl Guides movement was so strongly entrenched there.  The two girls’ organisations figure prominently in many of her novels.  She was significantly an enthusiastic English folk dancer.

There seems to be no archive of the British Camp Fire Girls Association, nor much written about it outside of Elsie J. Oxenham’s novels.  But Irene Purslow has posted on the Yesterday Remembered website about her experiences as a Camp Fire Girl in the 1940s and 1950s.  Originally she had tried the Brownies but didn’t like it.  Later she joined the Camp Fire Girls where she was known as Wasita.  She says that nobody apart from herself and a few friends she still has from those days remembers Camp Fire now, but that it was very popular then.  She describes earning her home craft honour by putting away clothing, rugs, furs and blankets when Summer came; by carrying in the fuel for the house every day for a month in Winter; and by scrubbing a floor once a week for two months.  Other activities she had to undertake were walking 35 miles over the course of ten days, learning to harness a horse to a cart and then driving the cart, and dancing five different folk dances.  She had to take cold baths and sleep outside on at least one night in two of the Winter months.  At Christmas the Camp made and filled stockings to take to a local children’s home.  She went on a Summer camping holiday, but only once and she has never camped in her life since.

The British Camp Fire Girls Association wound up in the 1970s, but its American counterpart, now known simply as Camp Fire and open to both sexes since 1985, is still going strong.

The growth and popularity of youth movements involving woodcraft and camping at the beginning of the 20th century can perhaps be explained in part because the start of the new century was seen as the dawn of a new age.  This was particularly the case in America where the Wild West had just been tamed and the old way of life of the Native Americans was coming to be seen as idealistic and completely in tune with nature and there was admiration for the way of the life of the old mountain men, such as Daniel Boone.  The influence of writers such as Ernest Thompson Seton heightened interest in nature and wildlife and encouraged activities such as camping and hiking.  The First World War then had an enormous effect on everyone.  Following the War people craved peace and desired to get closer to nature.  Young people who on both sides of the Atlantic had been brought up with tales of cowboys and Indians would find the youth movements attractive.  Many had lost relatives in the war (the British Legion says that over 340,000 children in the UK lost one or both parents) and so might well feel that joining a group would make them feel part of a big family again.

Paul

Image Pinterest / VAM

Ragged School Museum

The Ragged School Museum is located in Copperfield Road E3, tucked in between Mile End Park and the Regent’s Canal. The three buildings housing the museum were originally warehouses taking in goods brought along the canal, but in 1877 they were taken over and converted by Thomas Barnardo into what became the largest ragged school in London. Tens of thousands of children were educated there until, in 1908, there were enough government schools in the area and the ragged school was closed.

The buildings were then used for various industrial purposes, including a company making the Highwayman brand of motorbike leathers – in the sixties their leather jackets were popular with Rockers and stars such as John Lennon and Mick Jagger.

In the 1980s the buildings were threatened with demolition, but a group of local people were determined to save them and set up the Ragged School Museum Trust. The museum opened in 1990. Staffed by volunteers, it has displays of objects and images related to the school, to the East End and even to the leather company. But its main features are an authentic Victorian classroom – in its original location – and a Victorian East End kitchen. Each year thousands of schoolchildren come to dress up and experience a Victorian school lesson – the classroom comes complete with old-style double desks, a blackboard written up with pounds, shillings and pence, an abacus, a map of the British Empire, and even a cane and a dunce’s hat.

Ragged schools

Ragged schools were so-called because they were for poor and destitute children whose clothing was literally too ragged for them to be accepted into ordinary schools. Already in the 18th century there were schools established by churches or philanthropic individuals. For instance, in London a tailor named Thomas Cranfield offered free education for poor children at a Sunday school in Hackney, followed by a day school near London Bridge; by the time he died in 1838 he had set up 19 free schools.

Another benefactor was John Pounds in Portsmouth, who had suffered a crippling injury as a dockyard apprentice and turned instead to shoemaking. Beginning in 1818 and partly out of concern to educate his disabled nephew, Pounds took poor and homeless children into his workshop and taught them basic reading, writing and arithmetic, as well as some cooking, carpentry and shoemaking. He died in 1839, but he is celebrated as an inspiration of the ragged school movement. His work was particularly championed by Thomas Guthrie in Scotland, where a number of schools were set up in the 1840s. The same happened in London: for instance, in 1841 the Field Lane Ragged School was established, an institution that Charles Dickens was very familiar with.

Soon there were around 20 ragged schools in London and it became clear that it would be beneficial to organise them into a proper network, so in 1844 the London Ragged School Union was formed. A massive growth followed: by 1867 in London there were 226 Sunday schools, 204 day schools and 207 evening schools, attended by around 26,000 children.

The schools received patronage from wealthy and distinguished people: Lord Shaftesbury was president of the Union for 40 years, and Angela Burdett-Coutts was among those who donated to the cause. Following the 1870 Education Act, which introduced School Boards and led to a major programme of school building, the ragged schools became less necessary. Copperfield Road, founded as late as 1877, was an exception, but in general the number of ragged schools dropped and those that remained had to rethink what they were doing. Some had already developed extra facilities such as hostels, reading rooms and boys’ and men’s clubs. The Ragged School Union lasted until 1914, when it was merged into the Shaftesbury Society; this in turn merged with another charity, John Grooms, in 2007 to become Livability.

Carol

Sources

Photos: https://www.flickr.com/groups/cityoflondonhistory

http://www.raggedschoolmuseum.org.uk

http://www.infed.org/youthwork/ragged_schools.htm

https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/ragged-schools

http://vauxhallhistory.org/lambeth-ragged-school/

https://www.fieldlane.org.uk/roots-heritage (includes downloadable PDF ‘The Field Lane Story’)

 

Christ’s Hospital Exhibition – MOL

This was a small exhibition but it was interesting.  There was also an excellent affordable guidebook.

Christ’s Hospital was founded in 1552 after Edward VI wrote to the Lord Mayor, Sir Richard Dobbs, and asked him to help London’s poor. The Hospital started in buildings that had originally been occupied by the Grey Friars until the monastery was dissolved in 1538.  Money was raised by the City of London, and the Church, businesses and householders were asked to contribute.

Its purpose was to supply food, clothing, lodging and learning for fatherless children and other poor men’s children and when it opened there were 380 pupils. This rose rapidly to 500 in the first year. Out of the first 380 pupils, 100 were infants and they were sent to wet nurses outside London.  They attended local schools until they were 10 years old and were able to return to London to complete their education.

Girls were admitted from the beginning as well as boys.  The girls became servants or worked in craft trades.  The boys were taught writing, arithmetic and bookkeeping with most leaving to take up apprenticeships at the age of 15.  A few stayed on to study classics for university entrance, and from 1673, the Royal Mathematical School was established to prepare students for a career at sea starting with a seven year apprenticeship.

Diet was important and in 1721 the Governors discovered that from Thursday to Sunday the boys were only having ‘Bread and Cheese, pease pudding with Water Gruell’ so changes were made and a boiled leg and loin of mutton with a hearty broth were added on Friday and Saturday.

Pupils lived in the school for the whole year. After 1785 a change was made and those who had been at the school for three years were allowed to go on a holiday to friends or parents in August.

Before that change, children could leave the school on day visits if they wore a ‘’Leave ticket’. This was metal pendant that hung from a coat button.  If a child was found outside the grounds without a ‘Leave ticket’ they were punished and sometimes expelled for running away.  I was at a boarding school for 10 years in the 1950s and we were not allowed home at all during the term time although our families could visit for a weekend at half-term and take us out.  If we wanted to go into ‘town’ after the age of 11 we had to have behaved very well to earn the privilege, and could only go in groups of two or three.  If we had behaved badly then the alternative might be a detention e.g. ironing or writing lines! You could also be expelled for meeting boys from the nearby boys’ boarding school. So, when I was at school, things weren’t so very different in some ways from the 18th century!

Christ’s Hospital was, and is, a Bluecoat school and the uniform dates from 1553.  It was supplied by the school and still is – free of charge.  Blue may have been chosen as the dye was inexpensive.  The knee length stockings are yellow and the pupils used to wear a yellow body length garment under the coat in winter.  The buttons show the head of King Edward VI. In 2011 students and alumni voted on whether the uniform should be updated and over 95% voted to keep the original uniform. It may well be the oldest school uniform in existence.  On certain days in the  year the Christ’s hospital school band leads a parade through the City. The band also leads a march into lunch every day except Sunday – weather permitting – and there is a march-past on Speech Day. Many traditions are still kept.

Apart from keeping the same uniform and many of the old traditions, the school has been through many changes. 32 children died of the plague in 1665.A large part of the Hospital was destroyed in the Great Fire of London but no children were hurt. The buildings were rebuilt.  Girls were moved out to Hoddesdon and boys were moved to Ware. There were various changes after that but eventually the girls and boys were reunited at Horsham in 1985. There are now around 900 pupils with a 50:50 split between girls and boys. Around 830 are boarders and 70 are day pupils. The current fees are £11,480 per term for boarders and £7,470 (maximum per term for day pupils.

The real surprise is that 75% of the pupils receive financial support from the Foundation.  This support comes from the school’s founding charter as a charitable school.  Families on very low incomes may also be helped with the cost of pocket money, House Funds, travel and sports wear. Since 1552 over 65,000 pupils have been educated at Christ’s Hospital, and up to 1892 – when the Scheme of Administration changed – an estimated 45,000 were fed, clothed, housed and educated wholly from benefactions or from income derived from endowments given by benefactors.

Penny

photo Christchurch.org

Health and Welfare of Children: the history of school meals

Concerns about feeding poor children did not start in the late Victorian era. The provision of alms, schooling and providing food for poor children was considered a religious and philanthropic duty by many people throughout history. What does change by the end of the 19th century is that the problems caused by unregulated urban growth and the health and social problems it caused, led to the state taking a greater interest in health and welfare of children.

The UK was transformed by the industrial revolution. Enormous wealth was generated by newly emerging industries. Real wages actually rose and a middle class no longer depended on agriculture was becoming politically influential. The great cities grew very quickly. The population of London grew 6 fold in the 19th century from 1 million in 1800 to 6 million in 1900. Such rapid growth in population produced health and social problems. Epidemic illnesses such as cholera and typhus thrived in overcrowded unsanitary conditions. In 1838 the first public health acts were passed, under the administration of Edwin Chadwick, engineering solutions to problems of public health were implemented. The building of the London sewers and the provision of a safe water supply meant that there were no epidemics of cholera in London after1867. During the 19th century better statistics regarding health were collected and the appointment of Medical officers of health meant that good quality information about the health of the population became available to government and official enquiries.

Despite the improvements in urban infrastructure the health of population was still poor for many reasons. The rapid growth of cities had put enormous pressure on housing which particularly for the poor was damp, overcrowded and polluted. Air pollution was awful tons of soot were deposited on London annually the product of burning coal for industrial and domestic needs. Smog affected all social classes and in some London board schools the incidence of rickets (a disease caused by vitamin D deficiency exacerbated by a lack of sunlight) was over 90%. Air pollution also contributed to a high incidence of respiratory diseases. Urban food supplies were in a parlous state. Adulteration of food was common, storage was difficult and there was no government regulation on food hygiene and agricultural practice.

In the last 25 years of the 19th century there was no shortage of initiatives, writing and suggestions on how to deal with the problems of urban poverty. Authors like Charles Dickens and Elizabeth Gaskell wrote movingly of the lot of the very poor. Charles Booth, a wealthy Liverpool industrialist, had funded over 17 years a comprehensive investigation of poverty in London. His classification of households and the carefully drawn maps show how closely wealthy people lived to the very poor. Seebohm Rowntree in York had attempted to quantify the minimum income required to provide a family with an adequate and nutritious diet. Philanthropy flourished in the Victorian Era. There were at least 641 separate charities whose stated aim was to alleviate some form of urban deprivation. Finally if all else failed the workhouse would provide children with food, medical care and a basic education. The urban poor were not all passive recipients of middle class philanthropy. Self help measures such as friendly societies were founded; the trade union movement fought for the rights of working men and the expansion of the voting franchise gave a voice to the working classes. Feminist historians such as Lara Marks have written about informal networks of working women providing additional income and support to each other.

Many new laws covering housing, education and conditions in factories affected children in the last quarter of the 19th century but implementation was often patchy and not always enforced. Many worried about interfering in the mechanisms of capitalism through legislation. Children were regarded as possessions of their parents and there was a reluctance to allow the state to interfere in family life. Not only had Rowntree calculated that working class families received 25% less food than required for physical efficiency but distribution within the family was uneven. Men received the lion’s share of the food with women and children largely surviving on a diet of bread, jam and tea.

Debates about whether families were poor due to poor household management and general fecklessness ‘undeserving poor’ or due to low wages, ill health and poor environment ‘deserving poor’ are seen in Victorian reports. Similar arguments are often heard in our own media today. Independence and self reliance were to be encouraged. In 1859 Charles Darwin had published his theory of evolution. His cousin, Francis Galton, had come up with the concept of ‘Eugenics’. This is basically an idea that the race was degenerating largely due to the wrong sort of people having too many children. By 1890 a Movement of National Efficiency had been started following eugenic principals. It had many eminent followers, Beatrice and Sidney Webb, JBS Haldane and H.G.Wells to name a few.

What united the eugenicists and the philanthropists was concern about the poor physical condition of the population. These fears were emphasised in 1899 when for the first time since the Napoleonic Wars the British army was recruiting for volunteers. 35% of male volunteers failed to meet the minimum physical standard to join the army. The British army had been thoroughly rattled that their supposed crack imperial troops had been outwitted by a group of Boer farmers. In 1902 the English rugby team was thrashed by the visiting All Blacks. It seemed as though physical decline was no longer solely confined to the poor.

In 1904 the government decided to act and appointed the Interdepartmental Committee on Physical Deterioration. The committee’s brief was:-

  • Establish method of measuring health and physique
  • Suggest causes of deterioration
  • To suggest ways of improving health

The committee heard evidence from many sources, but in the end the detailed statistics and reports from the school inspectorate and public health officers won the argument that environmental change was necessary. In particular, the committee heard detailed evidence from Alfred Eichholz who was school inspector to many institutions including the Johana Street board school located the other side of Westminster Bridge from the committee. Eichholz offered to show the committee the level of ill health and deprivation the children suffered. The committee passed more than 50 resolutions including action on air pollution, banning the sale of tobacco to minors, physical exercise for children, school meals, a school health service and the provision of milk depots.

When the report was published and after a landslide victory for the Liberal party in 1906 a large amount of legislation affecting children was passed by parliament. The 1906 school meals act enabled local authorities to provide free school meals to children in state elementary schools. In 1907 legislation for school medical inspections, required new births to be notified to the local health department so that new mothers could be visited by health visitor. The children’s charter was passed in 1908 which removed children from the adult justice system.

There was still official reluctance to interfere in the free market by improving the material circumstances of working families with a minimum wage or improved worker’s rights. Local authorities, ever wary of their ratepayer’s reluctance to pay more were slow to adopt school meals. Initiatives that involved education and advice were seen as less contentious but even here there was reluctance for the state to been seen to interfere in the sanctity of the family.

The 1921 education act in response to rising costs tried to keep the budget for school meals to £300,000. The act sought to define who was eligible for free school meals but the miner’s strike increased the number of eligible children threefold. Throughout the depression that followed and the introduction of a rationing system large numbers of eligible children were not being provided for.

Ironically the school meals provision improved during world war two. Rationing was introduced in 1940 and the school meals service was expanded under government guidelines. By February 1945 1.6 million meals were being provided daily, 14% free and the rest charged to parents. The price charged only covered the cost of the ingredients and the government subsidy was about 75-90% of the costs.

The 1944 education act made it a statutory duty for LEAs to provide school meals and free school milk. Lord Woolton addressed the Warwickshire WI as follows:-

Feeding is not enough, it must be good feeding….chosen in the light of knowledge of what a growing child needs for building a sound body….well chosen, well cooked that calls for the highest degree of scientific catering’

Whilst those of us who ate school meals in the 1950s may not recognise these aspirations in the food we were given at least the meals were nutritious and well balanced. In 1951 49% of school children ate school meals. They ate more iron, calcium and vegetables and less sugar than children in the 1990s.

By the 1960s absolute rates of poverty had declined and the desire of successive governments to save money put tremendous pressure on school meals and free school milk. Free school milk had finally gone by the end of the 1970s. The 1979 education act introduced by the Thatcher government abolished minimal nutritional standards, removed from LEAs the obligation to provide meals for all children. Only those on benefits and eligible for free meals remained a statutory responsibility. Catering contracts were put out to commercial tender.

However, concerns over feeding children in schools still remains a hot political topic. After campaigns by Jamie Oliver and others over the poor quality of school meals, nutritional standards were reintroduced in1999. Today poor children are still badly fed but obesity is the new concern.

Dilys Cowan

Principal Sources

  • Hardy Anne Health and Medicine in Britain since 1860
  • Fraser Derek The Evolution of the British Welfare State
  • Cunningham Hugh Children and Childhood in Western Society since 1500
  • Gillard D (2003) Food for Thought: child nutrition the school dinner and the food industry http://www.educationengland.org.uk/article/22/food.html